fix: e2e invariant flake (#4017)

### Description

Context is explained in the comment, copying it here:
```
    // TODO: Sometimes we find more logs than expected. This may either mean that gas is deducted twice for the same message due to a bug,
    // or that submitting the message transaction fails for some messages. Figure out which is the case and convert this check to
    // strict equality.
    // EDIT: Having had a quick look, it seems like there are some legitimate reverts happening in the confirm step
    // (`Transaction attempting to process message either reverted or was reorged`)
    // in which case more gas expenditure logs than messages are expected.
```

### Drive-by changes

<!--
Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included?
-->

### Related issues

<!--
- Fixes #[issue number here]
-->

### Backward compatibility

<!--
Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure
implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits
using this infra tooling?

Yes/No
-->

### Testing

<!--
What kind of testing have these changes undergone?

None/Manual/Unit Tests
-->

rust/utils/run-locally/src/invariants.rs

@@ -69,8 +69,14 @@ pub fn termination_invariants_met(
             .len();
 
     // Zero insertion messages don't reach `submit` stage where gas is spent, so we only expect these logs for the other messages.
-    assert_eq!(
-        gas_expenditure_log_count as u32, total_messages_expected,
+    // TODO: Sometimes we find more logs than expected. This may either mean that gas is deducted twice for the same message due to a bug,
+    // or that submitting the message transaction fails for some messages. Figure out which is the case and convert this check to
+    // strict equality.
+    // EDIT: Having had a quick look, it seems like there are some legitimate reverts happening in the confirm step
+    // (`Transaction attempting to process message either reverted or was reorged`)
+    // in which case more gas expenditure logs than messages are expected.
+    assert!(
+        gas_expenditure_log_count as u32 >= total_messages_expected,
         "Didn't record gas payment for all delivered messages"
     );