1 Commits (0410b4e4b1e8d4043ffa6ae04802f352befa22fc)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Mantas-M	096aeff13e	feat: Splitting `rust` workspace into `main` and `sealevel` (#4438) ... ### Description The single rust workspace has been split into 2 workspaces. The sealevel workspace includes the contents of the previous `sealevel` folder and the main workspace includes everything else. The workspaces differ in rust versions as the sealevel has the old one to ensure compatability, the main workspace has and updated `rustc` version of `1.80.1`. Some dependencies and sub-dependencies have been locked in versions of the old pre-split workspace to ensure no breaking code changes. The rust CI workflow has been updated to include both workspaces in the tests. ### Drive-by changes N/A ### Related issues Relates to https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/issues/4361 ### Backward compatibility No. ### Testing Rust Unit tests from the CI	3 months ago
Daniel Savu	af5bd88aa8	V3 agents rebase (#2746) ... ### Description It's your favourite PR coming right back... V3 agents! Closes https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/issues/issues/561 Builds on top of https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/pull/2742 Depends on https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/pull/2681 for e2e testing This PR includes: - [x] Merkle tree hook indexer - [x] Merkle tree builder task - [x] Update submitter to trigger retries if no proof is available yet Slightly more detailed overview of the work here: https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/issues/2720#issuecomment-1724038643 <!-- What's included in this PR? --> ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues <!-- - Fixes #[issue number here] --> ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests --> --------- Co-authored-by: -f <kunalarora1729@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Trevor Porter <trkporter@ucdavis.edu> Co-authored-by: Kunal Arora <55632507+aroralanuk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Mattie Conover <git@mconover.dev> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Bouvignies <guillaumebouvignies@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Yorke Rhodes <yorke@hyperlane.xyz> Co-authored-by: Guillaume Bouvignies <guillaume.bouvignies@kurtosistech.com>	1 year ago
Daniel Savu	7889385501	Relayer aggregation ism (#2411) ... ### Description Adds AggregationISM support to the relayer, by adding the scaffolding, sub-ism metadata fetching, and custom metadata encoding. ### Drive-by changes - adds `dry_run_verify(...)` to the `InterchainSecurityModule` trait and implements it for `EthereumInterchainSecurityModule` - changes the default ISM in the test environment from `routingIsm(multisigIsm)` to `routingIsm(aggregationIsm([multisigIsm, messageIdIsm], threshold = 1))` ### Related issues - Fixes https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/issues/1757 ### Backward compatibility _Are these changes backward compatible?_ Yes _Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling?_ None ### Testing The AggregationISM metadata encoding is tested using unit tests whose input was taken from the tests in `AggregationIsm.t.sol`, by printing the individual ISM metadatas and the final metadata. The overall AggregationISM is tested with the `run-locally` script.	1 year ago
Asa Oines	63558af85d	Use interfaces in agents (#2022) ... ### Description Move agents to use contract interfaces artifacts rather than the artifacts themselves. This ensures we don't anything that we can't guarantee is in every implementation of that interface. Particularly relevant for IGPs and ISMs. ### Drive-by changes - Moves `solidity/interfaces` to `solidity/contracts/interfaces` so that their artifacts can be used in `update_abis.sh` ### Related issues - #1757 ### Backward compatibility _Are these changes backward compatible?_ Yes _Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling?_ None ### Testing _What kind of testing have these changes undergone?_ None	2 years ago