3 Commits (083817fc7abc5f4f7969d8a53d9bdadc8247ca81)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Kunal Arora	f26453ee55	fix(contracts): add `msg.Value` to `verifyMessageId` (#4541) ... ### Description - Added to the msg.value to verifyMessageId to test if the msgValue passed in is the same as the msgValue used postDispatch ### Drive-by changes - None ### Related issues - fixes https://github.com/chainlight-io/2024-08-hyperlane/issues/3 ### Backward compatibility Yes ### Testing Unit tests	1 month ago
Kunal Arora	469f2f3403	fix(contracts): quote management for L2->L1 hooks (#4552) ... ### Description - check for sufficient fees in `AbstractMessageIdAuthHook` and refund surplus - add a child hook to OPL2ToL1Hook and ArbL2ToL1Hook to use the igp to pay for the destination gas fees ~~Note: LayerzeroL2Hook currently also refunds from msg.value, will make it into issue to be fixed later as we're using the layerzero hooks right now.~~ ### Drive-by changes - None ### Related issues - fixes https://github.com/chainlight-io/2024-08-hyperlane/issues/10 ### Backward compatibility No ### Testing Fuzz	1 month ago
Lee	ae0990a0b3	LayerZero Hook and ISM (#3102) ... ### Description - Implements LayerZero V1 and V2 hook with V2 ISM. - V2 ISM is backwards compatible i.e., V1 hook (which uses V1 endpoint to send) can send to V2 ISM (which uses V2 endpoint to receive). See [here](https://docs.layerzero.network/explore/migration#configuring-ultralightnode301) for configuration. - V2 uses `AbstractsMessageIdAuthorized*`. In. other words, hook passes messageId through LayerZero, which stores into ISM to be used when relayer calls `verify()` . - Includes unit test for both V1 and V2 hook and ISM. - V1 uses official LayerZero endpoint mock. ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues - Implements #2853 ### Backward compatibility Yes ### Testing Manual/Unit Tests	9 months ago