2 Commits (2da6ccebe8716f40df00eceec4e5473277af429b)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Yorke Rhodes	1d18549755	Merge main to v3 (#2812)	1 year ago
Trevor Porter	3f3306c35e	Helloworld program and tooling (#2744) ... ### Description * HelloWorld program added to `rust/sealevel/programs/helloworld` * Some changes to the Sealevel tooling * Refactored the old warp-route-specific deploy management into a more generic framework for idempotently deploying and managing router apps in Sealevel * Added helloworld deploy tooling * Added ISM & owner checking to this router deployment tooling * Added `--require-tx-approval` to prevent txs from being called without first prompting * Added a bunch of new commands for creating txs with certain instructions that were needed along the way -- e.g. setting an ISM, deploying a specific multisig ISM (previously only one would be deployed as a part of `core deploy` * Added a command for configuring multisig ISMs, `multisig-ism-message-id configure`, that takes in a JSON file of multisig ISM configs and applies them onchain * A bit of cleanup / refactor - e.g. removed some old commands like `mailbox receive` * Added foreignDeployments into `RouterApp` * Because RouterApp takes in `contractsMap: HyperlaneContractsMap<Factories>,`, which require attached contracts, a new `readonly foreignDeployments: ChainMap<Address> = {},` is added to the constructor * These foreignDeployments are considered in the return value of `remoteChains(chainName: string)`, but not in `chains()` -- this means that `chains()` now concretely means "chains that can be deployed to / interacted with and that there is an entry in `contractsMap` for, and `remoteChains(chainName: string)` returns any and all remote chains, regardless of whether they can be deployed to / interacted with * Added complete ISM support to the HyperlaneRouterChecker * when checking the ISM, if there's not a match and the ISM is a config, then the ISM will be deployed * Also added RouterViolation, before it'd just throw if there was a violation * Updated the Helloworld, IGP, and core tooling to work when AEE deployments are also configured * Moved to Routing ISM -> Aggregation ISM -> Merkle / Message ID multisig setup Some things to note: * atm there are a few places that have a TODO saying to remove something after some multisig txs are executed, I plan to revisit these after we get some sigs * I've deployed the mainnet sealevel version of helloworld, but haven't been able to enroll it in the EVM chains yet. Waiting for some multisig activity here ### Drive-by changes ### Related issues #2502 ### Backward compatibility I believe it should all be backward compatible ### Testing Deployed, ran checkers, etc	1 year ago
Trevor Porter	8127fa5aac	Deploy proteustestnet, nautilus, solanadevnet (again), and solana (#2646) ... ### Description just opening for image for now ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues <!-- - Fixes #[issue number here] --> ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests --> --------- Co-authored-by: Daniel Savu <23065004+daniel-savu@users.noreply.github.com>	1 year ago