6 Commits (2da6ccebe8716f40df00eceec4e5473277af429b)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Yorke Rhodes	1d18549755	Merge main to v3 (#2812)	1 year ago
Trevor Porter	3f3306c35e	Helloworld program and tooling (#2744) ... ### Description * HelloWorld program added to `rust/sealevel/programs/helloworld` * Some changes to the Sealevel tooling * Refactored the old warp-route-specific deploy management into a more generic framework for idempotently deploying and managing router apps in Sealevel * Added helloworld deploy tooling * Added ISM & owner checking to this router deployment tooling * Added `--require-tx-approval` to prevent txs from being called without first prompting * Added a bunch of new commands for creating txs with certain instructions that were needed along the way -- e.g. setting an ISM, deploying a specific multisig ISM (previously only one would be deployed as a part of `core deploy` * Added a command for configuring multisig ISMs, `multisig-ism-message-id configure`, that takes in a JSON file of multisig ISM configs and applies them onchain * A bit of cleanup / refactor - e.g. removed some old commands like `mailbox receive` * Added foreignDeployments into `RouterApp` * Because RouterApp takes in `contractsMap: HyperlaneContractsMap<Factories>,`, which require attached contracts, a new `readonly foreignDeployments: ChainMap<Address> = {},` is added to the constructor * These foreignDeployments are considered in the return value of `remoteChains(chainName: string)`, but not in `chains()` -- this means that `chains()` now concretely means "chains that can be deployed to / interacted with and that there is an entry in `contractsMap` for, and `remoteChains(chainName: string)` returns any and all remote chains, regardless of whether they can be deployed to / interacted with * Added complete ISM support to the HyperlaneRouterChecker * when checking the ISM, if there's not a match and the ISM is a config, then the ISM will be deployed * Also added RouterViolation, before it'd just throw if there was a violation * Updated the Helloworld, IGP, and core tooling to work when AEE deployments are also configured * Moved to Routing ISM -> Aggregation ISM -> Merkle / Message ID multisig setup Some things to note: * atm there are a few places that have a TODO saying to remove something after some multisig txs are executed, I plan to revisit these after we get some sigs * I've deployed the mainnet sealevel version of helloworld, but haven't been able to enroll it in the EVM chains yet. Waiting for some multisig activity here ### Drive-by changes ### Related issues #2502 ### Backward compatibility I believe it should all be backward compatible ### Testing Deployed, ran checkers, etc	1 year ago
Trevor Porter	2d8fced77a	Support using Squads multisig with sealevel tooling, support ownership transfers in tooling (#2700) ... ### Description Sadly, there's no programmatic way to submit transactions to Squads via an API or anything. As a workaround, if `-k` is passed a Pubkey and not a path to a Keypair as the payer, transactions will instead be logged in a base58 serialized format that can then be copied into Squads. Instructions for exactly how to do this are found in our Notion So this includes: * Allow for the payer to just be a Pubkey without a Keypair * Some commands & functions to allow for ownership transfer ### Drive-by changes * There was a whole directory `rust/chains/hyperlane-sealevel/src/solana` that somehow got into main, I deleted this * Cleaned up some logs to be formatted more nicely ### Related issues part of https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/issues/issues/545 ### Backward compatibility backward compatible ### Testing Transferred ownership of devnet --------- Co-authored-by: Daniel Savu <23065004+daniel-savu@users.noreply.github.com>	1 year ago
Daniel Savu	71e8988ccd	Sealevel igp indexing (#2585) ... ### Description Depends on https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/pull/2583 Indexes IGP payments related to the relayer's data pda address. Unless this address is specified in the config (`sealevel.relayer_account `), no filtering is applied and all IGP payments are stored in the local database. <!-- What's included in this PR? --> ### Drive-by changes - Sets `HYP_BASE_GASPAYMENTENFORCEMENT` in `run-locally` for the relayer, to test that it correctly indexes the IGP payment before submitting the message - A new config section (`sealevel`) is added to the relayer - The `MessageIndexer` trait is replaced with `SequenceIndexer<HyperlaneMessage>`, renaming `fetch_count_at_tip` to `sequence_at_tip`. `SequenceIndexer` is now common to both the message and igp indexers. - The `parse_addr` macro is modified so it can be reused when parsing the sealevel relayer address config too - `rust/utils/sealevel-test.bash` is included because I was using it to test locally, but I can remove it if the sealevel e2e test already does all the steps there @mattiecnvr - Performs a `try_into` conversion that can be removed once https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/issues/2610 is done ### Related issues - Fixes https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/issues/2501 ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? --> e2e tests but the pipeline is failing, likely fixed by https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/pull/2602 --------- Co-authored-by: Trevor Porter <trkporter@ucdavis.edu>	1 year ago
Daniel Savu	0178eeca08	fix(sealevel): use `overflow-checks` in the release profile (#2636) ... ### Description Uses `overflow-checks` in the release profiles of all sealevel programs and libraries, to revert txs when this happens. ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues - Fixes https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/issues/2590 ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests -->	1 year ago
Trevor Porter	c53c1f7059	Sealevel IGP connection client support, warp routes support gas payments (#2613) ... ### Description * Adds IGP configuration to the connection client * Adds gas router, which are used by warp routes to have configured gas amounts * Adds resizing of the HyperlaneToken account to warp routes (useful for remote routers & gas routers which can change size) * Adds IGP configuration to warp routes * Pays for gas in warp routes is an IGP is configured * Updates deploy tooling for warp routes to allow the IGP to be set, defaulting to the overhead IGP if one isn't configured ### Drive-by changes * Removed the CLI command `token init`, which we never really expect to be used directly anymore and is just dead weight. This instead happens in `warp-route deploy` behind the scenes * Moved IGP tests into their own crate to avoid a cyclical dependency situation between the IGP crate and test-utils. This is why `mailbox-test` exists too ### Related issues * Fixes #2494 ### Backward compatibility The storage layout of the warp route programs changes with this. So this is incompatible with existing sealevel testnet warp route deployments ### Testing e2e test, unit tests	1 year ago
Mattie Conover	9045f8362e	IGP Tooling (#2602) ... ### Description Adds support for deploying IGPs and initial setup. Also extends the E2E tests to support these changes. - Deploy an IGP - Configure gas oracle data on IGPs - Configure gas overhead amounts for overhead IGP - Adds new config files to support the above - Adds support for u128 in `serde_json` ### Drive-by changes - Minor code cleanup around unused build cmd args - Refactored transaction submission to prevent common errors. - Cleaned up arg passing in the core commands ### Related issues Fixes #2500 ### Backward compatibility Yes-ish, slightly changes some sealevel commands but mostly the same. See the e2e test if in doubt. ### Testing Manual Unit Tests --------- Co-authored-by: Trevor Porter <trkporter@ucdavis.edu>	1 year ago