4 Commits (8bfa8c13cc1125eea85fab9b32058ddd9d6a5076)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Trevor Porter	5b4af6bf1d	Injective-specific account info protobuf (#3144) ... ### Description Only change needed was to correctly handle the account info. Because we may want to handle injective testnet, added `is_injective` fn to HyperlaneDomain instead of just doing the match directly. Happy to import some of the longer fully qualified names instead ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues <!-- - Fixes #[issue number here] --> ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests -->	10 months ago
Daniel Savu	80f1a5688e	fix: support TLS gRPC endpoints (#3122) ... ### Description Supporting TLS gRPC endpoints is as simple as enabling the `tonic` crate features in this PR. However to maintain compatiblity with the plaintext endpoints, we need to always use `http` instead of `https`, otherwise `tonic` will try to establish a TLS connection to them and fail. ### Related issues - Fixes https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/issues/issues/893 ### Backward compatibility No, in the sense that all prior plaintext urls need to be changed from `https` to `http` ### Testing Manual	11 months ago
Daniel Savu	8e44bc1b81	feat: sealevel merkle indexer + e2e (#3053) ... Depends on https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/pull/3048 Fixes https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/issues/3046 Fixes https://github.com/hyperlane-xyz/hyperlane-monorepo/issues/2754	11 months ago
Trevor Porter	ece2be507a	Cosmos / CosmWasm agents (#2865) ... ### Description <!-- What's included in this PR? --> ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues <!-- - Fixes #[issue number here] --> ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests --> --------- Co-authored-by: Mattie Conover <git@mconover.dev> Co-authored-by: hashableric <hashableric@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: byeongsu-hong <hong@byeongsu.dev> Co-authored-by: Daniel Savu <23065004+daniel-savu@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Nam Chu Hoai <nambrot@googlemail.com> Co-authored-by: Yorke Rhodes <yorke@hyperlane.xyz>	1 year ago