3 Commits (94e6ca21eebeed715bf15b70b3d0381ca545bdb2)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Noah Bayindirli 🥂	38358ececd	feat: deprecate Mumbai testnet (#3521) ... ### Description - Removes all reference to Mumbai testnet, since it is soon being [deprecated](https://polygon.technology/blog/polygon-pos-is-cooking-the-napoli-upgrade-means-better-ux-the-mumbai-testnet-takes-a-bow) by the Polygon team - Monorepo docker tag: https://console.cloud.google.com/gcr/images/abacus-labs-dev/global/hyperlane-monorepo@sha256:d4b44359cae9c4e3bdeb6f965c59d056f7fce72c42069adc0dea038ac600785a/details?authuser=5&project=abacus-labs-dev&tab=info - Agent docker tag: https://console.cloud.google.com/gcr/images/abacus-labs-dev/global/hyperlane-agent@sha256:a578d96f7f06721d0b6cd8095d6a1fa5d22f01b59eba3320ee3b1fe34ca3c5df/details?authuser=5&project=abacus-labs-dev&tab=info ### Drive-by changes - Adds missing Testnet domains, Fuji & BSC Testnet - Fix for failing `test-rs` CI check with ``` error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `chain::KnownHyperlaneDomain::Fuji` and `chain::KnownHyperlaneDomain::BinanceSmartChainTestnet` not covered --> hyperlane-core/src/utils.rs:226:15 | 226 | match $v { | ^^ patterns `chain::KnownHyperlaneDomain::Fuji` and `chain::KnownHyperlaneDomain::BinanceSmartChainTestnet` not covered ``` ### Related issues - Dependency on #3523 - Fixes #1181 ### Backward compatibility - [x] Backwards compatible - [x] Requires docker image tags to be added post-build - [x] Requires agent artifact cleanup in cloud account: https://www.notion.so/hyperlanexyz/Runbook-83c755f2652943289cf98cd1309487a8?pvs=4#77730653a12f409dacfbd427cab545d3 ### Testing * Build success * `yarn hyperlane chains list -e testnet` does not return `mumbai` * fork.sh script success locally	8 months ago
Paul Balaji	76bd730103	feat: remove goerli testnets (#3389)	9 months ago
Yorke Rhodes	1d18549755	Merge main to v3 (#2812)	1 year ago
Trevor Porter	3f3306c35e	Helloworld program and tooling (#2744) ... ### Description * HelloWorld program added to `rust/sealevel/programs/helloworld` * Some changes to the Sealevel tooling * Refactored the old warp-route-specific deploy management into a more generic framework for idempotently deploying and managing router apps in Sealevel * Added helloworld deploy tooling * Added ISM & owner checking to this router deployment tooling * Added `--require-tx-approval` to prevent txs from being called without first prompting * Added a bunch of new commands for creating txs with certain instructions that were needed along the way -- e.g. setting an ISM, deploying a specific multisig ISM (previously only one would be deployed as a part of `core deploy` * Added a command for configuring multisig ISMs, `multisig-ism-message-id configure`, that takes in a JSON file of multisig ISM configs and applies them onchain * A bit of cleanup / refactor - e.g. removed some old commands like `mailbox receive` * Added foreignDeployments into `RouterApp` * Because RouterApp takes in `contractsMap: HyperlaneContractsMap<Factories>,`, which require attached contracts, a new `readonly foreignDeployments: ChainMap<Address> = {},` is added to the constructor * These foreignDeployments are considered in the return value of `remoteChains(chainName: string)`, but not in `chains()` -- this means that `chains()` now concretely means "chains that can be deployed to / interacted with and that there is an entry in `contractsMap` for, and `remoteChains(chainName: string)` returns any and all remote chains, regardless of whether they can be deployed to / interacted with * Added complete ISM support to the HyperlaneRouterChecker * when checking the ISM, if there's not a match and the ISM is a config, then the ISM will be deployed * Also added RouterViolation, before it'd just throw if there was a violation * Updated the Helloworld, IGP, and core tooling to work when AEE deployments are also configured * Moved to Routing ISM -> Aggregation ISM -> Merkle / Message ID multisig setup Some things to note: * atm there are a few places that have a TODO saying to remove something after some multisig txs are executed, I plan to revisit these after we get some sigs * I've deployed the mainnet sealevel version of helloworld, but haven't been able to enroll it in the EVM chains yet. Waiting for some multisig activity here ### Drive-by changes ### Related issues #2502 ### Backward compatibility I believe it should all be backward compatible ### Testing Deployed, ran checkers, etc	1 year ago