hyperlane-monorepo

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Paul Balaji	76bd730103	feat: remove goerli testnets (#3389 )	9 months ago
Yorke Rhodes	1d18549755	Merge main to v3 (#2812 )	1 year ago
Trevor Porter	3f3306c35e	Helloworld program and tooling (#2744 ) ### Description * HelloWorld program added to `rust/sealevel/programs/helloworld` * Some changes to the Sealevel tooling * Refactored the old warp-route-specific deploy management into a more generic framework for idempotently deploying and managing router apps in Sealevel * Added helloworld deploy tooling * Added ISM & owner checking to this router deployment tooling * Added `--require-tx-approval` to prevent txs from being called without first prompting * Added a bunch of new commands for creating txs with certain instructions that were needed along the way -- e.g. setting an ISM, deploying a specific multisig ISM (previously only one would be deployed as a part of `core deploy` * Added a command for configuring multisig ISMs, `multisig-ism-message-id configure`, that takes in a JSON file of multisig ISM configs and applies them onchain * A bit of cleanup / refactor - e.g. removed some old commands like `mailbox receive` * Added foreignDeployments into `RouterApp` * Because RouterApp takes in `contractsMap: HyperlaneContractsMap<Factories>,`, which require attached contracts, a new `readonly foreignDeployments: ChainMap<Address> = {},` is added to the constructor * These foreignDeployments are considered in the return value of `remoteChains(chainName: string)`, but not in `chains()` -- this means that `chains()` now concretely means "chains that can be deployed to / interacted with and that there is an entry in `contractsMap` for, and `remoteChains(chainName: string)` returns any and all remote chains, regardless of whether they can be deployed to / interacted with * Added complete ISM support to the HyperlaneRouterChecker * when checking the ISM, if there's not a match and the ISM is a config, then the ISM will be deployed * Also added RouterViolation, before it'd just throw if there was a violation * Updated the Helloworld, IGP, and core tooling to work when AEE deployments are also configured * Moved to Routing ISM -> Aggregation ISM -> Merkle / Message ID multisig setup Some things to note: * atm there are a few places that have a TODO saying to remove something after some multisig txs are executed, I plan to revisit these after we get some sigs * I've deployed the mainnet sealevel version of helloworld, but haven't been able to enroll it in the EVM chains yet. Waiting for some multisig activity here ### Drive-by changes ### Related issues #2502 ### Backward compatibility I believe it should all be backward compatible ### Testing Deployed, ran checkers, etc	1 year ago
Trevor Porter	8127fa5aac	Deploy proteustestnet, nautilus, solanadevnet (again), and solana (#2646 ) ### Description just opening for image for now ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues <!-- - Fixes #[issue number here] --> ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests --> --------- Co-authored-by: Daniel Savu <23065004+daniel-savu@users.noreply.github.com>	1 year ago
Trevor Porter	f5b59c9a30	Remove zbctestnet (#2633 ) ### Description No longer needed because of the updated Eclipse plan - the RPC URL was shut down as well ### Drive-by changes no ### Related issues n/a ### Backward compatibility removes zbctestnet chain ### Testing deployed, builds	1 year ago
Trevor Porter	8c5983933b	Sealevel (#2404 ) ### Description Opening for that sweet sweet agent image ### Drive-by changes _Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included?_ ### Related issues - Fixes #[issue number here] ### Backward compatibility _Are these changes backward compatible?_ Yes No _Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling?_ None Yes ### Testing _What kind of testing have these changes undergone?_ None Manual Unit Tests --------- Co-authored-by: Steven Sloboda <steven@eclipse.builders> Co-authored-by: Nam Chu Hoai <nambrot@googlemail.com> Co-authored-by: Yorke Rhodes <yorke@hyperlane.xyz> Co-authored-by: J M Rossy <jm.rossy@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Mattie Conover <git@mconover.dev> Co-authored-by: Asa Oines <asaoines@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Sergei Patrikeev <serejke.best@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Daniel Savu <23065004+daniel-savu@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Kunal Arora <55632507+aroralanuk@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: yorhodes <yorkerhodesiv@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Yorke Rhodes <yorke@useabacus.network> Co-authored-by: Yorke Rhodes <email@yorke.dev> Co-authored-by: Asa Oines <asaoines@Asas-MacBook-Pro.local> Co-authored-by: Kunal Arora <kuarora@ucsd.edu> Co-authored-by: Anett <44020788+anettrolikova@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Yaqub Mahmoud <yaqub320@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Alex <alex@alexbh.dev>	1 year ago

5 Commits (b379336b9187413211650a3d836b3ca48abd59f1)