hyperlane-monorepo

The home for Hyperlane core contracts, sdk packages, and other infrastructure

blockchain hyperlane interchain monorepo

History

Daniel Savu d90d8f86b4 chore: reduce op-queue verbosity (#4092 ) ### Description The gcp bill has been shooting up, and it's most likely due to the increased number of undeliverable messages being added to and removed from the queue, causing lots of `debug` level logs on `push` and `pop_many` to be emitted. This PR changes the verbosity to `trace` - we'll have lower visibility over the lifetime of a message, but there should be sufficient logs remaining to tell us what's going on (such as [operation prepared](`30630c4fa6/rust/agents/relayer/src/msg/op_submitter.rs (L240)`), [confirming a pre-submitted one](`30630c4fa6/rust/agents/relayer/src/msg/op_submitter.rs (L260)`), [submitting single op](`30630c4fa6/rust/agents/relayer/src/msg/op_submitter.rs (L313)`), [submitting batch](`30630c4fa6/rust/agents/relayer/src/msg/op_submitter.rs (L456)`), and [op confirmed](`30630c4fa6/rust/agents/relayer/src/msg/op_submitter.rs (L386)`)). @paulbalaji suggested measuring log counts, so here they are: - in the last 6h, we had 42M `hyperlane` relayer logs, of which 22M where `push` logs and 1.1M were `pop_many` (no `pop`s) - if we make push ones trace, 5.5% of the remaining logs would be pop_many ### Drive-by changes <!-- Are there any minor or drive-by changes also included? --> ### Related issues <!-- - Fixes #[issue number here] --> ### Backward compatibility <!-- Are these changes backward compatible? Are there any infrastructure implications, e.g. changes that would prohibit deploying older commits using this infra tooling? Yes/No --> ### Testing <!-- What kind of testing have these changes undergone? None/Manual/Unit Tests -->		5 months ago
..
.cargo	feat: Relayer tokio task instrumentation (#3760 )	6 months ago
src	chore: reduce op-queue verbosity (#4092 )	5 months ago
Cargo.toml	chore: some throughput tweaks (#4036 )	5 months ago