[committee] Enable Staking on localnet at epoch 3

core/state_transition.go

@@ -285,8 +285,10 @@ func (st *StateTransition) StakingTransitionDb() (usedGas uint64, err error) {
 	// Pay intrinsic gas
 	// TODO: propose staking-specific formula for staking transaction
 	gas, err := IntrinsicGas(st.data, false, homestead)
+	// TODO Remove this logging
+	utils.Logger().Info().Uint64("Using", gas).Msg("Gas cost of staking transaction being processed")
+
 	if err != nil {
-		utils.Logger().Error().Uint64("needed", gas).Msg("Not enough gas in staking transaction")
 		return 0, err
 	}
 	if err = st.useGas(gas); err != nil {

internal/params/config.go

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ var (
 		ChainID:        TestnetChainID,
 		CrossTxEpoch:   big.NewInt(0),
 		CrossLinkEpoch: big.NewInt(0),
-		StakingEpoch:   EpochTBD,
+		StakingEpoch:   big.NewInt(3),
 		EIP155Epoch:    big.NewInt(0),
 		S3Epoch:        big.NewInt(0),
 	}

shard/committee/assignment.go

@@ -119,7 +119,8 @@ func eposStakedCommittee(
 	// TODO Nervous about this because overtime the list will become quite large
 	candidates := stakerReader.ValidatorCandidates()
 	essentials := map[common.Address]effective.SlotOrder{}
-	utils.Logger().Info().Int("candidates-count", len(candidates)).Msg("Preparing EPoS Staked Committee")
+
+	utils.Logger().Info().Int("staked-candidates", len(candidates)).Msg("preparing epos staked committee")
 
 	// TODO benchmark difference if went with data structure that sorts on insert
 	for i := range candidates {
@@ -172,7 +173,11 @@ func eposStakedCommittee(
 			&slot.Dec,
 		})
 	}
-
+	if c := len(candidates); c != 0 {
+		utils.Logger().Info().Int("staked-candidates", c).
+			RawJSON("staked-super-committee", []byte(superComm.JSON())).
+			Msg("EPoS based super-committe")
+	}
 	return superComm, nil
 }