The decrupt message confirmation UI will crash if the origin metadata
is not present. This PR makes the UI tolerant of that metadata being
missing. It was always intended to be optional anyway.
The decrupt message confirmation UI will crash if the origin metadata
is not present. This PR makes the UI tolerant of that metadata being
missing. It was always intended to be optional anyway.
Fixes#9244
When trying to connect a Trezor account on a fresh install of MetaMask,
the radio buttons on the account selection page would not respond to
being clicked.
When debugging this, it looks like the `onChange` event was never
triggered. A radio `<input>` element should trigger `onChange` whenever
the selection state change, but seemingly this wouldn't happen if the
change in selection state was undone during the same render cycle. If
I paused at a breakpoint during the render, I could see the checkbox
get selected then unselected again without triggering `onChange`.
The simplest fix was to use `onClick` instead of `onChange`. This seems
more appropriate anyway because we're treating the radio button as a
controlled component here, so the state of the underlying element isn't
really of any concern.
The "Next nonce" warning warns users when the custom nonce they set is
higher than our suggested nonce. This warning was mistakenly being
shown even when we didn't have a suggested nonce yet.
Fixes#9989
New year, new problems.
It's working as expected, but we had hard-coded some 2020 date values, and `formatDateWithYearContext` adds the year to its output formatted date if the date is not from the current year.
Co-authored-by: Erik Marks <25517051+rekmarks@users.noreply.github.com>
New year, new problems.
It's working as expected, but we had hard-coded some 2020 date values, and `formatDateWithYearContext` adds the year to its output formatted date if the date is not from the current year.
Ensures that `hideLoadingIndication` is always called in all actions that call `showLoadingIndication`. It's unclear how many of these actions were failing to hide the loading indication, because other actions superset `hideLoadingIndication`.
At the very least, `updateTransaction` was probably failing to hide the loading indication in the error case.
This PR also refactors a lot of actions to call `hideLoadingIndication` once in `finally` blocks as opposed to multiple times across `try` and `catch` blocks. We avoided making changes to functions using `Promise` methods, because `Promise.finally` is not supported by Waterfox, and it's not properly transpiled by Babel.
Ensures that `hideLoadingIndication` is always called in all actions that call `showLoadingIndication`. It's unclear how many of these actions were failing to hide the loading indication, because other actions superset `hideLoadingIndication`.
At the very least, `updateTransaction` was probably failing to hide the loading indication in the error case.
This PR also refactors a lot of actions to call `hideLoadingIndication` once in `finally` blocks as opposed to multiple times across `try` and `catch` blocks. We avoided making changes to functions using `Promise` methods, because `Promise.finally` is not supported by Waterfox, and it's not properly transpiled by Babel.
A data race was introduced in #9919 when the old synchronous storage
API was replaced with an async storage API. The problem arises when
`fetchWithCache` is called a second time while it's still processing
another call. In this case, the `cachedFetch` object can become
stale while blocked waiting for a fetch response, and result in a cache
being overwritten unintentionally.
See this example (options omitted for simplicity, and assuming an empty
initial cache):
```
await Promise.all([
fetchWithCache('https://metamask.io/foo'),
fetchWithCache('https://metamask.io/bar'),
]
```
The order of events could be as follows:
1. Empty cache retrieved for `/foo` route
2. Empty cache retrieved for `/bar` route
3. Call made to `/foo` route
4. Call made to `/bar` route
5. `/foo` response is added to the empty cache object retrieved in
step 1, then is saved in the cache.
6. `/bar` response is added to the empty cache object retrieved in
step 2, then is saved in the cache.
In step 6, the cache object saved would not contain the `/foo`
response set in step 5. As a result, `/foo` would never be cached.
This problem was resolved by embedding the URL being cached directly in
the cache key. This prevents simultaneous responses from overwriting
each others caches.
Technically a data race still exists when handing simultaneous
responses to the same route, but the result would be that the last call
to finish would overwrite the previous. This seems acceptable.
A data race was introduced in #9919 when the old synchronous storage
API was replaced with an async storage API. The problem arises when
`fetchWithCache` is called a second time while it's still processing
another call. In this case, the `cachedFetch` object can become
stale while blocked waiting for a fetch response, and result in a cache
being overwritten unintentionally.
See this example (options omitted for simplicity, and assuming an empty
initial cache):
```
await Promise.all([
fetchWithCache('https://metamask.io/foo'),
fetchWithCache('https://metamask.io/bar'),
]
```
The order of events could be as follows:
1. Empty cache retrieved for `/foo` route
2. Empty cache retrieved for `/bar` route
3. Call made to `/foo` route
4. Call made to `/bar` route
5. `/foo` response is added to the empty cache object retrieved in
step 1, then is saved in the cache.
6. `/bar` response is added to the empty cache object retrieved in
step 2, then is saved in the cache.
In step 6, the cache object saved would not contain the `/foo`
response set in step 5. As a result, `/foo` would never be cached.
This problem was resolved by embedding the URL being cached directly in
the cache key. This prevents simultaneous responses from overwriting
each others caches.
Technically a data race still exists when handing simultaneous
responses to the same route, but the result would be that the last call
to finish would overwrite the previous. This seems acceptable.
Additional validation was added in #9907 to ensure that the "Known
contract address" warning was shown when sending tokens to another
token address after switching assets on the Send screen. Unfortunately
this change had the unintended side-effect of preventing _all_ token
sends after switching assets, so long as the recipient was not an
internal address.
The problem is that the `validate` function expects to be passed the
address of the token send recipient in the case where a token is
selected. Instead the token address was being passed to the validate
function.
The `query` state is now used, which should always contain the
recipient address. This is the same state used in the only other place
the `validate` function is called.
Additional validation was added in #9907 to ensure that the "Known
contract address" warning was shown when sending tokens to another
token address after switching assets on the Send screen. Unfortunately
this change had the unintended side-effect of preventing _all_ token
sends after switching assets, so long as the recipient was not an
internal address.
The problem is that the `validate` function expects to be passed the
address of the token send recipient in the case where a token is
selected. Instead the token address was being passed to the validate
function.
The `query` state is now used, which should always contain the
recipient address. This is the same state used in the only other place
the `validate` function is called.
The TokenList component on the `add-token` page had the name `InfoBox`,
which doesn't seem applicable. It has been renamed to `TokenList`, to
match the module filename and the component name we use elsewhere.
Dan J Miller
Mark Stacey
Erik Marks
Brad Decker
ImanH
ivigamberdiev
David Walsh
Nicholas Rodrigues Lordello