* Create `.zip` files deterministically
Our build system now creates `.zip` archives deterministically.
Previously the `.zip` file would differ between builds even when the
files being archived were identical. This was because the order the
files were passed in was non-deterministic, and the `mtime` for each
file was different between builds.
The files are now sorted before being zipped, and the `mtime` for each
file has been set to the unix epoch.
* Update lavamoat build policy
* Create `.zip` files deterministically
Our build system now creates `.zip` archives deterministically.
Previously the `.zip` file would differ between builds even when the
files being archived were identical. This was because the order the
files were passed in was non-deterministic, and the `mtime` for each
file was different between builds.
The files are now sorted before being zipped, and the `mtime` for each
file has been set to the unix epoch.
* Update lavamoat build policy
* lavamoat - apply lavamoat protections to popup and notification
* build - enable lavamoat for home
* lavamoat - add missing ui overrides for react family
* deps/patches - patch zxcvbn for ses compat
We currently store the JSON-RPC request and response objects in the permission activity log. The utility of doing this was always rather dubious, but never problematic. Until now.
In Flask, as the restricted methods have expanded in number, user secrets may be included on JSON-RPC message objects. This PR removes these properties from the permission activity log, and adds a migration which does the same to existing log objects. We don't interact with the log objects anywhere in our codebase, but we don't want unexpected properties to cause errors in the future should any log objects be retained.
This PR also updates relevant tests and test data. It makes a minor functional change to how a request is designated as a success or failure, but this should not change any behavior in practice.
An array of integers is now used to represent the SRP in three cases:
* In the import wallet flow, the UI uses it to pass the user-provided
SRP to the background (which converts the array to a buffer).
* In the create wallet flow, the UI uses it to retrieve the generated
SRP from the background.
* When persisting the wallet to state, the background uses it to
serialize the SRP.
Co-authored-by: Elliot Winkler <elliot.winkler@gmail.com>
This commit modifies the build system so that TypeScript files can be
transpiled into ES5 just like JavaScript files.
Note that this commit does NOT change the build system to run TypeScript
files through the TypeScript compiler. In other words, no files will be
type-checked at the build stage, as we expect type-checking to be
handled elsewhere (live, via your editor integration with `tsserver`,
and before a PR is merged, via `yarn lint`). Rather, we merely instruct
Babel to strip TypeScript-specific syntax from any files that have it,
as if those files had been written using JavaScript syntax alone.
Why take this approach? Because it prevents the build process from being
negatively impacted with respect to performance (as TypeScript takes a
significant amount of time to run).
It's worth noting the downside of this approach: because we aren't
running files through TypeScript, but relying on Babel's [TypeScript
transform][1] to identify TypeScript syntax, this transform has to keep
up with any syntax changes that TypeScript adds in the future. In fact
there are a few syntactical forms that Babel already does not recognize.
These forms are rare or are deprecated by TypeScript, so I don't
consider them to be a blocker, but it's worth noting just in case it
comes up later. Also, any settings we place in `tsconfig.json` will be
completely ignored by Babel. Again, this isn't a blocker because there
are some analogs for the most important settings reflected in the
options we can pass to the transform. These and other caveats are
detailed in the [documentation for the transform][2].
[1]: https://babeljs.io/docs/en/babel-plugin-transform-typescript
[2]: https://babeljs.io/docs/en/babel-plugin-transform-typescript#caveats
There were several issues related to a retry mechanism. The latest keyring
offers a significant speed and UX enhancement relative to the previous release.
For full details, see:
GridPlus/eth-lattice-keyring@v0.5.0...v0.6.1
There were several issues related to a retry mechanism. The latest keyring
offers a significant speed and UX enhancement relative to the previous release.
For full details, see:
GridPlus/eth-lattice-keyring@v0.5.0...v0.6.1
This commit allows developers to write TypeScript files and lint them
(either via a language server in their editor of choice or through the
`yarn lint` command).
The new TypeScript configuration as well as the updated ESLint
configuration not only includes support for parsing TypeScript files,
but also provides some compatibility between JavaScript and TypeScript.
That is, it makes it possible for a TypeScript file that imports a
JavaScript file or a JavaScript file that imports a TypeScript file to
be linted.
Note that this commit does not integrate TypeScript into the build
system yet, so we cannot start converting files to TypeScript and
pushing them to the repo until that final step is complete.
* deprecate extensionizer for webextension-polyfill
* fix tests
* remove extensionizer
* fix browser windows api calls
* fix broken on firefox
* fix getAcceptLanguages call
* update more browser apis that are now promisified
* remove unnecessary console error ignoring in e2e tests
An array of integers is now used to represent the SRP in three cases:
* In the import wallet flow, the UI uses it to pass the user-provided
SRP to the background (which converts the array to a buffer).
* In the create wallet flow, the UI uses it to retrieve the generated
SRP from the background.
* When persisting the wallet to state, the background uses it to
serialize the SRP.
Co-authored-by: Elliot Winkler <elliot.winkler@gmail.com>
We would like to insert TypeScript into the ESLint configuration, and
because of the way that the current config is organized, that is not
easy to do.
Most files are assumed to be files that are suited for running in a
browser context. This isn't correct, as we should expect most files to
work in a Node context instead. This is because all browser-based files
will be run through a transpiler that is able to make use of
Node-specific variables anyway.
There are a couple of important ways we can categories files which our
ESLint config should be capable of handling well:
* Is the file a script or a module? In other words, does the file run
procedurally or is the file intended to be brought into an existing
file?
* If the file is a module, does it use the CommonJS syntax (`require()`)
or does it use the ES syntax (`import`/`export`)?
When we introduce TypeScript, this set of questions will become:
* Is the file a script or a module?
* If the file is a module, is it a JavaScript module or a TypeScript
module?
* If the file is a JavaScript module, does it use the CommonJS syntax
(`require()`) or does it use the ES syntax (`import`/`export`)?
To represent these divisions, this commit removes global rules — so now
all of the rules are kept in `overrides` for explicitness — and sets up
rules for CommonJS- and ES-module-compatible files that intentionally do
not overlap with each other. This way TypeScript (which has its own set
of rules independent from JavaScript and therefore shouldn't overlap
with the other rules either) can be easily added later.
Finally, this commit splits up the ESLint config into separate files and
adds documentation to each section. This way sets of rules which are
connected to a particular plugin (`jsdoc`, `@babel`, etc.) can be easily
understood instead of being obscured.
Dan J Miller
kumavis
Alex Donesky
Mark Stacey
Frederik Bolding
Alex Miller
Daniel
Jyoti Puri
ryanml
Shane
Erik Marks
Elliot Winkler
Erik Marks
VSaric