* Various component tests and some conditional statements
Conditional in account-menu in removeAccount when keyring sometimes is not initially provideed
Conditional on unlock-page when there is no target.getBoundingClientRect on the element.
* Update helpers
* Remove component debugging
* Add default params for render helpers
* Remove stubComponent for old Mascot
Changes in https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/7893 has prevented the need to stub it out.
Change logout to lock in account-menu test
Any error sent to Sentry will now be marked with the environment they
were sent from. The environment is set at build time, and is set
dependant upon the build flags and CI-related environment variables.
Setting the environment will let us filter error reports in Sentry to
focus specifically upon reports sent from production, release
candidates, PR testing, or whatever else.
The custom spend limit was previously not validated. It did have a
minimum of zero set, but this didn't have any affect (that minimum is
used for form constraint validation, and this field wasn't in a form).
The field was never checked to ensure the contents didn't exceed the
maximum.
The field is now checked for values that exceed the maximum, and
invalid values in general (including negative values).
The parameters to the `showEditApprovalPermissionModal` were also
alphabetized to make them easier to read. In the course of doing this,
I noticed that the origin was missing from one of the calls. This was
responsible for the modal saying "Spend limit requested by undefined"
when clicking "Edit" under the transaction details. This has been
fixed.
The custom spend limit was previously not validated. It did have a
minimum of zero set, but this didn't have any affect (that minimum is
used for form constraint validation, and this field wasn't in a form).
The field was never checked to ensure the contents didn't exceed the
maximum.
The field is now checked for values that exceed the maximum, and
invalid values in general (including negative values).
The parameters to the `showEditApprovalPermissionModal` were also
alphabetized to make them easier to read. In the course of doing this,
I noticed that the origin was missing from one of the calls. This was
responsible for the modal saying "Spend limit requested by undefined"
when clicking "Edit" under the transaction details. This has been
fixed.
These two functions differ slightly in options, but none of those
options are being used by us, so in these cases they're functionally
equivalent. They're even both descendants of the original `debounce`
function from `underscore`.
This was done to reduce the number of direct dependencies we have. It
should not affect bundle size, as we still depend upon the `debounce`
package transitively.
This was done to reduce the number of direct dependencies we have. It
should be functionally equivalent. The bundle size should not change,
as we use `clone` as a transitive dependency in a number of places.
Previously, all errors encountered during testing or production were
sent to the primary `metamask` Sentry project, whereas development
errors were sent to `test-metamask` instead. This change ensures that
errors encountered during tests are sent to `test-metamask` as well.
In the case where the initial spend limit for the `approve` function
was set to the maximum amount, editing this value would result in the
new limit being silently ignored. The transaction would be submitted
with the original max spend limit.
This occurred because function to generate the new custom data would
look for the expected spend limit in the existing data, then bail if
it was not found (and in these cases, it was never found).
The reason the value was not found is that it was erroneously being
converted to a `Number`. A JavaScript `Number` is not precise enough to
represent larger spend limits, so it would give the wrong hex value
(after rounding had taken place in the conversion to a floating-point
number).
The data string is now updated without relying upon the original token
value; the new value is inserted after the `spender` argument instead,
as the remainder of the `data` string is guaranteed to be the original
limit. Additionally, the conversion to a `Number` is now omitted so
that the custom spend limit is encoded correctly.
Fixes#7915
After updating the custom spend limit on the approve screen, the data
for the transaction was not being updated. Instead it showed the
original transaction data. The transaction data was being updated
correctly in the final transaction though.
The approve screen has been updated to ensure changes to the custom
spend limit are reflected correctly in the data shown.
In the case where the initial spend limit for the `approve` function
was set to the maximum amount, editing this value would result in the
new limit being silently ignored. The transaction would be submitted
with the original max spend limit.
This occurred because function to generate the new custom data would
look for the expected spend limit in the existing data, then bail if
it was not found (and in these cases, it was never found).
The reason the value was not found is that it was erroneously being
converted to a `Number`. A JavaScript `Number` is not precise enough to
represent larger spend limits, so it would give the wrong hex value
(after rounding had taken place in the conversion to a floating-point
number).
The data string is now updated without relying upon the original token
value; the new value is inserted after the `spender` argument instead,
as the remainder of the `data` string is guaranteed to be the original
limit. Additionally, the conversion to a `Number` is now omitted so
that the custom spend limit is encoded correctly.
Fixes#7915
* Use ref instead of findDOMNode in jazzicon component
The jazzicon component was using `findDOMNode` to get the DOM node for
the main div returned by the component, which is generally not
recommended. Instead a ref is now used.
* Update Jazzicon to v2
This version drops the dependency upon `raphael`, and no longer uses
the function `createSVGMatrix` which was causing unit tests to fail
(because it's not supported by jsdom).
Our JSDoc documentation has not been updated in a very long time, and
we don't use JSDoc in enough places for the docs to have been
especially useful. The tools and scripts used to generate and publish
these docs have been removed.
References to this documentation have also been removed from the
README.
Hopefully once the TypeScript migration has made substantial progress,
we can generate more useful documentation using something like TypeDoc.
After updating the custom spend limit on the approve screen, the data
for the transaction was not being updated. Instead it showed the
original transaction data. The transaction data was being updated
correctly in the final transaction though.
The approve screen has been updated to ensure changes to the custom
spend limit are reflected correctly in the data shown.
Whymarrh Whitby
Thomas Huang
Mark Stacey
ryanml
MetaMask Bot
Brandon Lucas