One main configurable story has been added, plus a few distinct other
examples. All props are covered except `className`, which seems safe to
ignore.
Default props have been added to `Identicon` to make more explicit what
defaults were expected; there is no functional change.
The recommended way of writing stories changed in Storybook v5.2 to
the Component Story Format (CSF). Instead of using `storiesOf` and
running everything upon module import, the new story format is a
declarative description of each component that uses ES6 import
semantics.
Previously when the `diameter` prop of the `jazzicon` component was
changed, the new diameter would be ignored. The jazzicon is now
redrawn upon each change, as you would expect.
I don't think it's possible for this bug to manifest itself in the
extension. This was discovered through tinkering with the Storybook
for this component.
The identicon was showing as a white circle on the connect page. This
was a CSS error introduced when `jazzicon` was updated in #7898.
The white circle shown was the white border around the identicon. This
circle is an adjacent `div` in the DOM, and was rendered _underneath_
the identicon itself because it was placed first in the DOM.
Unfortunately the new version of `jazzicon` is no longer explicitly
positioned (it used to have `position: relative` set internally), so
now it's lower in the stack order regardless of DOM position.
Rather than placing the border adjacent and relying upon both elements
being positioned, the border has been changed into a wrapping `div`
instead. Now the stack order is more explicit.
In our base stylesheets we set the `body` background color to white.
This unfortunately also affected the preview area of Storybook. The
Storybook preview only renders isolated components, but it does
include all styles.
To avoid this problem, the white background color has been moved to
the `#app-content` div instead. All of our UI is inside this div.
Implement `eth_decrypt` and `eth_getEncryptionPublicKey`. This allows decryption backed by the user's private key. The message decryption uses a confirmation flow similar to the messaging signing flow, where the message to be decrypted is also able to be decrypted inline for the user to read directly before confirming.
ENS currently supports a variety of tlds in addition to `.eth`, and
more will be supported in the future. Rather than hard-code a list of
supported ENS tlds, all valid domain names will now be interpreted as
potential ENS addresses in our address input component.
Closes#7978
ENS currently supports a variety of tlds in addition to `.eth`, and
more will be supported in the future. Rather than hard-code a list of
supported ENS tlds, all valid domain names will now be interpreted as
potential ENS addresses in our address input component.
Closes#7978
The QR scanner component error handling would sometimes redirect the
user to the wrong page. It was also confusingly handled in two places;
the action used to open the QR scanner, and the scanner component.
The error handling has now been corrected, simplified, and integrated
into the QR scanner component itself.
The old way of handling an error within the component was to close the
modal, then call the action to open it all over again. This action took
a route parameter, which instructed the action on which route to open
if the fullscreen UI needed to be opened (as the fullscreen UI is the
only one where the browser will show the camera permission prompt).
This redirection worked just fine for handling the initial opening
of the QR scanner modal. But for any subsequent errors the same action
was used with a _default route_, meaning the user could click "try
again" and find themselves on a completely different screen.
Instead, errors now trigger a state change instead of closing and re-
opening the modal. The permission checks in the action have been
integrated into the component as well.
One functional change is that the scenario where you have an invalid
QR code has been made an error. Previously this just showed the error
message below the video preview, but left the user with no way to try
again. There error page has a "Try again" button, so it seemed better
suited as an error. Also the message literally started with "Error:".
Another functional change is that _all_ errors during initialization
will result in the error UI being shown. Previously there was one error
case that would instead log to the console and leave the user stuck.
* Use @metamask/eslint-config@1.1.0
* Use eslint-plugin-mocha@6.2.2
* Mark root ESLint config as root
* Update Mocha ESLint rules with shared ESLint config
* Various component tests and some conditional statements
Conditional in account-menu in removeAccount when keyring sometimes is not initially provideed
Conditional on unlock-page when there is no target.getBoundingClientRect on the element.
* Update helpers
* Remove component debugging
* Add default params for render helpers
* Remove stubComponent for old Mascot
Changes in https://github.com/MetaMask/metamask-extension/pull/7893 has prevented the need to stub it out.
Change logout to lock in account-menu test
The custom spend limit was previously not validated. It did have a
minimum of zero set, but this didn't have any affect (that minimum is
used for form constraint validation, and this field wasn't in a form).
The field was never checked to ensure the contents didn't exceed the
maximum.
The field is now checked for values that exceed the maximum, and
invalid values in general (including negative values).
The parameters to the `showEditApprovalPermissionModal` were also
alphabetized to make them easier to read. In the course of doing this,
I noticed that the origin was missing from one of the calls. This was
responsible for the modal saying "Spend limit requested by undefined"
when clicking "Edit" under the transaction details. This has been
fixed.
The custom spend limit was previously not validated. It did have a
minimum of zero set, but this didn't have any affect (that minimum is
used for form constraint validation, and this field wasn't in a form).
The field was never checked to ensure the contents didn't exceed the
maximum.
The field is now checked for values that exceed the maximum, and
invalid values in general (including negative values).
The parameters to the `showEditApprovalPermissionModal` were also
alphabetized to make them easier to read. In the course of doing this,
I noticed that the origin was missing from one of the calls. This was
responsible for the modal saying "Spend limit requested by undefined"
when clicking "Edit" under the transaction details. This has been
fixed.
These two functions differ slightly in options, but none of those
options are being used by us, so in these cases they're functionally
equivalent. They're even both descendants of the original `debounce`
function from `underscore`.
This was done to reduce the number of direct dependencies we have. It
should not affect bundle size, as we still depend upon the `debounce`
package transitively.
This was done to reduce the number of direct dependencies we have. It
should be functionally equivalent. The bundle size should not change,
as we use `clone` as a transitive dependency in a number of places.
In the case where the initial spend limit for the `approve` function
was set to the maximum amount, editing this value would result in the
new limit being silently ignored. The transaction would be submitted
with the original max spend limit.
This occurred because function to generate the new custom data would
look for the expected spend limit in the existing data, then bail if
it was not found (and in these cases, it was never found).
The reason the value was not found is that it was erroneously being
converted to a `Number`. A JavaScript `Number` is not precise enough to
represent larger spend limits, so it would give the wrong hex value
(after rounding had taken place in the conversion to a floating-point
number).
The data string is now updated without relying upon the original token
value; the new value is inserted after the `spender` argument instead,
as the remainder of the `data` string is guaranteed to be the original
limit. Additionally, the conversion to a `Number` is now omitted so
that the custom spend limit is encoded correctly.
Fixes#7915
After updating the custom spend limit on the approve screen, the data
for the transaction was not being updated. Instead it showed the
original transaction data. The transaction data was being updated
correctly in the final transaction though.
The approve screen has been updated to ensure changes to the custom
spend limit are reflected correctly in the data shown.
In the case where the initial spend limit for the `approve` function
was set to the maximum amount, editing this value would result in the
new limit being silently ignored. The transaction would be submitted
with the original max spend limit.
This occurred because function to generate the new custom data would
look for the expected spend limit in the existing data, then bail if
it was not found (and in these cases, it was never found).
The reason the value was not found is that it was erroneously being
converted to a `Number`. A JavaScript `Number` is not precise enough to
represent larger spend limits, so it would give the wrong hex value
(after rounding had taken place in the conversion to a floating-point
number).
The data string is now updated without relying upon the original token
value; the new value is inserted after the `spender` argument instead,
as the remainder of the `data` string is guaranteed to be the original
limit. Additionally, the conversion to a `Number` is now omitted so
that the custom spend limit is encoded correctly.
Fixes#7915
* Use ref instead of findDOMNode in jazzicon component
The jazzicon component was using `findDOMNode` to get the DOM node for
the main div returned by the component, which is generally not
recommended. Instead a ref is now used.
* Update Jazzicon to v2
This version drops the dependency upon `raphael`, and no longer uses
the function `createSVGMatrix` which was causing unit tests to fail
(because it's not supported by jsdom).
After updating the custom spend limit on the approve screen, the data
for the transaction was not being updated. Instead it showed the
original transaction data. The transaction data was being updated
correctly in the final transaction though.
The approve screen has been updated to ensure changes to the custom
spend limit are reflected correctly in the data shown.
Mark Stacey
Dan J Miller
ryanml
Erik Marks
Whymarrh Whitby
ricky
Konstantin
Jenny Pollack
Dan Finlay
Vodopyanov Egor
ryanml
William Morriss
Thomas Huang