You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
1447 lines
43 KiB
1447 lines
43 KiB
import { strict as assert } from 'assert'
|
|
import { find } from 'lodash'
|
|
import nanoid from 'nanoid'
|
|
import sinon from 'sinon'
|
|
|
|
import {
|
|
METADATA_STORE_KEY,
|
|
METADATA_CACHE_MAX_SIZE,
|
|
WALLET_PREFIX,
|
|
} from '../../../../../app/scripts/controllers/permissions/enums'
|
|
|
|
import {
|
|
PermissionsController,
|
|
addInternalMethodPrefix,
|
|
} from '../../../../../app/scripts/controllers/permissions'
|
|
|
|
import {
|
|
grantPermissions,
|
|
} from './helpers'
|
|
|
|
import {
|
|
noop,
|
|
constants,
|
|
getters,
|
|
getNotifyDomain,
|
|
getNotifyAllDomains,
|
|
getPermControllerOpts,
|
|
} from './mocks'
|
|
|
|
const {
|
|
ERRORS,
|
|
NOTIFICATIONS,
|
|
PERMS,
|
|
} = getters
|
|
|
|
const {
|
|
ALL_ACCOUNTS,
|
|
ACCOUNTS,
|
|
DUMMY_ACCOUNT,
|
|
ORIGINS,
|
|
PERM_NAMES,
|
|
REQUEST_IDS,
|
|
EXTRA_ACCOUNT,
|
|
} = constants
|
|
|
|
const initNotifications = () => {
|
|
return Object.values(ORIGINS).reduce((acc, domain) => {
|
|
acc[domain] = []
|
|
return acc
|
|
}, {})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const initPermController = (notifications = initNotifications()) => {
|
|
return new PermissionsController({
|
|
...getPermControllerOpts(),
|
|
notifyDomain: getNotifyDomain(notifications),
|
|
notifyAllDomains: getNotifyAllDomains(notifications),
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
const getMockRequestUserApprovalFunction = (permController) => (id, origin) => {
|
|
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.set(id, { origin, resolve, reject })
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
describe('permissions controller', function () {
|
|
|
|
describe('getAccounts', function () {
|
|
|
|
let permController
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
permController = initPermController()
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.a,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.b,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.b.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('gets permitted accounts for permitted origins', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const aAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.a)
|
|
const bAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.b)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
aAccounts, [ACCOUNTS.a.primary],
|
|
'first origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
bAccounts, [ACCOUNTS.b.primary],
|
|
'second origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('does not get accounts for unpermitted origins', async function () {
|
|
const cAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.c)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(cAccounts, [], 'origin should have no accounts')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('does not handle "metamask" origin as special case', async function () {
|
|
const metamaskAccounts = await permController.getAccounts('metamask')
|
|
assert.deepEqual(metamaskAccounts, [], 'origin should have no accounts')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('hasPermission', function () {
|
|
|
|
it('returns correct values', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const permController = initPermController()
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.a,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.b,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.test_method()
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
permController.hasPermission(ORIGINS.a, 'eth_accounts'),
|
|
'should return true for granted permission'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
permController.hasPermission(ORIGINS.b, 'test_method'),
|
|
'should return true for granted permission'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!permController.hasPermission(ORIGINS.a, 'test_method'),
|
|
'should return false for non-granted permission'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!permController.hasPermission(ORIGINS.b, 'eth_accounts'),
|
|
'should return true for non-granted permission'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!permController.hasPermission('foo', 'eth_accounts'),
|
|
'should return false for unknown origin'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
!permController.hasPermission(ORIGINS.b, 'foo'),
|
|
'should return false for unknown permission'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('clearPermissions', function () {
|
|
|
|
it('notifies all appropriate domains and removes permissions', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const notifications = initNotifications()
|
|
const permController = initPermController(notifications)
|
|
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.a,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.b,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.b.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.c,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.c.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
let aAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.a)
|
|
let bAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.b)
|
|
let cAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
aAccounts, [ACCOUNTS.a.primary],
|
|
'first origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
bAccounts, [ACCOUNTS.b.primary],
|
|
'second origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
cAccounts, [ACCOUNTS.c.primary],
|
|
'third origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
permController.clearPermissions()
|
|
|
|
Object.keys(notifications).forEach((origin) => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[origin],
|
|
[ NOTIFICATIONS.removedAccounts() ],
|
|
'origin should have single wallet_accountsChanged:[] notification',
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
aAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.a)
|
|
bAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.b)
|
|
cAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.c)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(aAccounts, [], 'first origin should have no accounts')
|
|
assert.deepEqual(bAccounts, [], 'second origin should have no accounts')
|
|
assert.deepEqual(cAccounts, [], 'third origin should have no accounts')
|
|
|
|
Object.keys(notifications).forEach((origin) => {
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
permController.permissions.getPermissionsForDomain(origin),
|
|
[],
|
|
'origin should have no permissions'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
Object.keys(permController.permissions.getDomains()), [],
|
|
'all domains should be deleted'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('removePermissionsFor', function () {
|
|
|
|
let permController, notifications
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
notifications = initNotifications()
|
|
permController = initPermController(notifications)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.a,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.b,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.b.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('removes permissions for multiple domains', async function () {
|
|
|
|
let aAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.a)
|
|
let bAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.b)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
aAccounts, [ACCOUNTS.a.primary],
|
|
'first origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
bAccounts, [ACCOUNTS.b.primary],
|
|
'second origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
permController.removePermissionsFor({
|
|
[ORIGINS.a]: [PERM_NAMES.eth_accounts],
|
|
[ORIGINS.b]: [PERM_NAMES.eth_accounts],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
aAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.a)
|
|
bAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.b)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(aAccounts, [], 'first origin should have no accounts')
|
|
assert.deepEqual(bAccounts, [], 'second origin should have no accounts')
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.a], [NOTIFICATIONS.removedAccounts()],
|
|
'first origin should have correct notification'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.b], [NOTIFICATIONS.removedAccounts()],
|
|
'second origin should have correct notification'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
Object.keys(permController.permissions.getDomains()), [],
|
|
'all domains should be deleted'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('only removes targeted permissions from single domain', async function () {
|
|
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.b, PERMS.finalizedRequests.test_method()
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
let bPermissions = permController.permissions.getPermissionsForDomain(ORIGINS.b)
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
(
|
|
bPermissions.length === 2 &&
|
|
find(bPermissions, { parentCapability: PERM_NAMES.eth_accounts }) &&
|
|
find(bPermissions, { parentCapability: PERM_NAMES.test_method })
|
|
),
|
|
'origin should have correct permissions'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
permController.removePermissionsFor({
|
|
[ORIGINS.b]: [PERM_NAMES.test_method],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
bPermissions = permController.permissions.getPermissionsForDomain(ORIGINS.b)
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
(
|
|
bPermissions.length === 1 &&
|
|
find(bPermissions, { parentCapability: PERM_NAMES.eth_accounts })
|
|
),
|
|
'only targeted permission should have been removed'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('removes permissions for a single domain, without affecting another', async function () {
|
|
|
|
permController.removePermissionsFor({
|
|
[ORIGINS.b]: [PERM_NAMES.eth_accounts],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const aAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.a)
|
|
const bAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.b)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
aAccounts, [ACCOUNTS.a.primary],
|
|
'first origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(bAccounts, [], 'second origin should have no accounts')
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.a], [],
|
|
'first origin should have no notifications'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.b], [NOTIFICATIONS.removedAccounts()],
|
|
'second origin should have correct notification'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
Object.keys(permController.permissions.getDomains()), [ORIGINS.a],
|
|
'only first origin should remain'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('send notification but does not affect permissions for unknown domain', async function () {
|
|
|
|
// it knows nothing of this origin
|
|
permController.removePermissionsFor({
|
|
[ORIGINS.c]: [PERM_NAMES.eth_accounts],
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.c], [NOTIFICATIONS.removedAccounts()],
|
|
'unknown origin should have notification'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const aAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.a)
|
|
const bAccounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.b)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
aAccounts, [ACCOUNTS.a.primary],
|
|
'first origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
bAccounts, [ACCOUNTS.b.primary],
|
|
'second origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
Object.keys(permController.permissions.getDomains()),
|
|
[ORIGINS.a, ORIGINS.b],
|
|
'should have correct domains'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('validatePermittedAccounts', function () {
|
|
|
|
let permController
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
permController = initPermController()
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.a,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.b,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.b.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('throws error on non-array accounts', async function () {
|
|
|
|
await assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController.validatePermittedAccounts(undefined),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.invalidParam(),
|
|
'should throw on undefined'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController.validatePermittedAccounts(false),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.invalidParam(),
|
|
'should throw on false'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController.validatePermittedAccounts(true),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.invalidParam(),
|
|
'should throw on true'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController.validatePermittedAccounts({}),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.invalidParam(),
|
|
'should throw on non-array object'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('throws error on empty array of accounts', async function () {
|
|
|
|
await assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController.validatePermittedAccounts([]),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.invalidParam(),
|
|
'should throw on empty array'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('throws error if any account value is not in keyring', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const keyringAccounts = await permController.getKeyringAccounts()
|
|
|
|
await assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController.validatePermittedAccounts([DUMMY_ACCOUNT]),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.nonKeyringAccount(DUMMY_ACCOUNT),
|
|
'should throw on non-keyring account'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController.validatePermittedAccounts(keyringAccounts.concat(DUMMY_ACCOUNT)),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.nonKeyringAccount(DUMMY_ACCOUNT),
|
|
'should throw on non-keyring account with other accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('succeeds if all accounts are in keyring', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const keyringAccounts = await permController.getKeyringAccounts()
|
|
|
|
await assert.doesNotThrow(
|
|
() => permController.validatePermittedAccounts(keyringAccounts),
|
|
'should not throw on all keyring accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await assert.doesNotThrow(
|
|
() => permController.validatePermittedAccounts([ keyringAccounts[0] ]),
|
|
'should not throw on single keyring account'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await assert.doesNotThrow(
|
|
() => permController.validatePermittedAccounts([ keyringAccounts[1] ]),
|
|
'should not throw on single keyring account'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('addPermittedAccount', function () {
|
|
let permController, notifications
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
notifications = initNotifications()
|
|
permController = initPermController(notifications)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.a,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.b,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.b.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if account is not a string', async function () {
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.addPermittedAccount(ORIGINS.a, {}),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.nonKeyringAccount({}),
|
|
'should throw on non-string account param'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if given account is not in keyring', async function () {
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.addPermittedAccount(ORIGINS.a, DUMMY_ACCOUNT),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.nonKeyringAccount(DUMMY_ACCOUNT),
|
|
'should throw on non-keyring account'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if origin is invalid', async function () {
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.addPermittedAccount(false, EXTRA_ACCOUNT),
|
|
ERRORS.addPermittedAccount.invalidOrigin(),
|
|
'should throw on invalid origin'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if origin lacks any permissions', async function () {
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.addPermittedAccount(ORIGINS.c, EXTRA_ACCOUNT),
|
|
ERRORS.addPermittedAccount.invalidOrigin(),
|
|
'should throw on origin without permissions'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if origin lacks eth_accounts permission', async function () {
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.c,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.test_method()
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.addPermittedAccount(ORIGINS.c, EXTRA_ACCOUNT),
|
|
ERRORS.addPermittedAccount.noEthAccountsPermission(),
|
|
'should throw on origin without eth_accounts permission'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if account is already permitted', async function () {
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.addPermittedAccount(ORIGINS.a, ACCOUNTS.a.permitted[0]),
|
|
ERRORS.addPermittedAccount.alreadyPermitted(),
|
|
'should throw if account is already permitted'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should successfully add permitted account', async function () {
|
|
await permController.addPermittedAccount(ORIGINS.a, EXTRA_ACCOUNT)
|
|
|
|
const accounts = await permController._getPermittedAccounts(ORIGINS.a)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
accounts, [...ACCOUNTS.a.permitted, EXTRA_ACCOUNT],
|
|
'origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.a][0],
|
|
NOTIFICATIONS.newAccounts([ACCOUNTS.a.primary]),
|
|
'origin should have correct notification'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('removePermittedAccount', function () {
|
|
let permController, notifications
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
notifications = initNotifications()
|
|
permController = initPermController(notifications)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.a,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.b,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.b.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if account is not a string', async function () {
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.removePermittedAccount(ORIGINS.a, {}),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.nonKeyringAccount({}),
|
|
'should throw on non-string account param'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if given account is not in keyring', async function () {
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.removePermittedAccount(ORIGINS.a, DUMMY_ACCOUNT),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.nonKeyringAccount(DUMMY_ACCOUNT),
|
|
'should throw on non-keyring account'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if origin is invalid', async function () {
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.removePermittedAccount(false, EXTRA_ACCOUNT),
|
|
ERRORS.removePermittedAccount.invalidOrigin(),
|
|
'should throw on invalid origin'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if origin lacks any permissions', async function () {
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.removePermittedAccount(ORIGINS.c, EXTRA_ACCOUNT),
|
|
ERRORS.removePermittedAccount.invalidOrigin(),
|
|
'should throw on origin without permissions'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if origin lacks eth_accounts permission', async function () {
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.c,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.test_method()
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.removePermittedAccount(ORIGINS.c, EXTRA_ACCOUNT),
|
|
ERRORS.removePermittedAccount.noEthAccountsPermission(),
|
|
'should throw on origin without eth_accounts permission'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if account is not permitted', async function () {
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => permController.removePermittedAccount(ORIGINS.b, ACCOUNTS.c.permitted[0]),
|
|
ERRORS.removePermittedAccount.notPermitted(),
|
|
'should throw if account is not permitted'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should successfully remove permitted account', async function () {
|
|
await permController.removePermittedAccount(ORIGINS.a, ACCOUNTS.a.permitted[1])
|
|
|
|
const accounts = await permController._getPermittedAccounts(ORIGINS.a)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
accounts, ACCOUNTS.a.permitted.filter((acc) => acc !== ACCOUNTS.a.permitted[1]),
|
|
'origin should have correct accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.a][0],
|
|
NOTIFICATIONS.newAccounts([ACCOUNTS.a.primary]),
|
|
'origin should have correct notification'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should remove eth_accounts permission if removing only permitted account', async function () {
|
|
await permController.removePermittedAccount(ORIGINS.b, ACCOUNTS.b.permitted[0])
|
|
|
|
const accounts = await permController.getAccounts(ORIGINS.b)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
accounts, [],
|
|
'origin should have no accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const permission = await permController.permissions.getPermission(
|
|
ORIGINS.b, PERM_NAMES.eth_accounts
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(permission, undefined, 'origin should not have eth_accounts permission')
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.b][0],
|
|
NOTIFICATIONS.removedAccounts(),
|
|
'origin should have correct notification'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('finalizePermissionsRequest', function () {
|
|
|
|
let permController
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
permController = initPermController()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('throws on non-keyring accounts', async function () {
|
|
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
permController.finalizePermissionsRequest(
|
|
PERMS.requests.eth_accounts(), [DUMMY_ACCOUNT]
|
|
),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.nonKeyringAccount(DUMMY_ACCOUNT),
|
|
'should throw on non-keyring account'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('adds caveat to eth_accounts permission', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const perm = await permController.finalizePermissionsRequest(
|
|
PERMS.requests.eth_accounts(),
|
|
ACCOUNTS.a.permitted,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(perm, PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted))
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('replaces caveat of eth_accounts permission', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const perm = await permController.finalizePermissionsRequest(
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted),
|
|
ACCOUNTS.b.permitted,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
perm, PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.b.permitted),
|
|
'permission should have correct caveat'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('handles non-eth_accounts permission', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const perm = await permController.finalizePermissionsRequest(
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.test_method(),
|
|
ACCOUNTS.b.permitted,
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
perm, PERMS.finalizedRequests.test_method(),
|
|
'permission should have correct caveat'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('preferences state update', function () {
|
|
|
|
let permController, notifications, preferences, identities
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
identities = ALL_ACCOUNTS.reduce(
|
|
(identities, account) => {
|
|
identities[account] = {}
|
|
return identities
|
|
},
|
|
{}
|
|
)
|
|
preferences = {
|
|
getState: sinon.stub(),
|
|
subscribe: sinon.stub(),
|
|
}
|
|
preferences.getState.returns({
|
|
identities,
|
|
selectedAddress: DUMMY_ACCOUNT,
|
|
})
|
|
notifications = initNotifications()
|
|
permController = new PermissionsController({
|
|
...getPermControllerOpts(),
|
|
notifyDomain: getNotifyDomain(notifications),
|
|
notifyAllDomains: getNotifyAllDomains(notifications),
|
|
preferences,
|
|
})
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.b,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts([...ACCOUNTS.a.permitted, EXTRA_ACCOUNT])
|
|
)
|
|
grantPermissions(
|
|
permController, ORIGINS.c,
|
|
PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw if given invalid account', async function () {
|
|
|
|
assert(preferences.subscribe.calledOnce)
|
|
assert(preferences.subscribe.firstCall.args.length === 1)
|
|
const onPreferencesUpdate = preferences.subscribe.firstCall.args[0]
|
|
|
|
await assert.rejects(
|
|
() => onPreferencesUpdate({ selectedAddress: {} }),
|
|
ERRORS._handleAccountSelected.invalidParams(),
|
|
'should throw if account is not a string'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should do nothing if account not permitted for any origins', async function () {
|
|
assert(preferences.subscribe.calledOnce)
|
|
assert(preferences.subscribe.firstCall.args.length === 1)
|
|
const onPreferencesUpdate = preferences.subscribe.firstCall.args[0]
|
|
|
|
await onPreferencesUpdate({ selectedAddress: DUMMY_ACCOUNT })
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.b], [],
|
|
'should not have emitted notification'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.c], [],
|
|
'should not have emitted notification'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should emit notification if account already first in array for each connected site', async function () {
|
|
identities[ACCOUNTS.a.permitted[0]] = { lastSelected: 1000 }
|
|
assert(preferences.subscribe.calledOnce)
|
|
assert(preferences.subscribe.firstCall.args.length === 1)
|
|
const onPreferencesUpdate = preferences.subscribe.firstCall.args[0]
|
|
|
|
await onPreferencesUpdate({ selectedAddress: ACCOUNTS.a.permitted[0] })
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.b],
|
|
[NOTIFICATIONS.newAccounts([ACCOUNTS.a.primary])],
|
|
'should not have emitted notification'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.c],
|
|
[NOTIFICATIONS.newAccounts([ACCOUNTS.a.primary])],
|
|
'should not have emitted notification'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should emit notification just for connected domains', async function () {
|
|
identities[EXTRA_ACCOUNT] = { lastSelected: 1000 }
|
|
assert(preferences.subscribe.calledOnce)
|
|
assert(preferences.subscribe.firstCall.args.length === 1)
|
|
const onPreferencesUpdate = preferences.subscribe.firstCall.args[0]
|
|
|
|
await onPreferencesUpdate({ selectedAddress: EXTRA_ACCOUNT })
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.b],
|
|
[NOTIFICATIONS.newAccounts([EXTRA_ACCOUNT])],
|
|
'should have emitted notification'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.c], [],
|
|
'should not have emitted notification'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should emit notification for multiple connected domains', async function () {
|
|
identities[ACCOUNTS.a.permitted[1]] = { lastSelected: 1000 }
|
|
assert(preferences.subscribe.calledOnce)
|
|
assert(preferences.subscribe.firstCall.args.length === 1)
|
|
const onPreferencesUpdate = preferences.subscribe.firstCall.args[0]
|
|
|
|
await onPreferencesUpdate({ selectedAddress: ACCOUNTS.a.permitted[1] })
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.b],
|
|
[NOTIFICATIONS.newAccounts([ACCOUNTS.a.permitted[1]])],
|
|
'should have emitted notification'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.c],
|
|
[NOTIFICATIONS.newAccounts([ACCOUNTS.c.primary])],
|
|
'should have emitted notification'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('approvePermissionsRequest', function () {
|
|
|
|
let permController, mockRequestUserApproval
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
permController = initPermController()
|
|
mockRequestUserApproval = getMockRequestUserApprovalFunction(
|
|
permController
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('does nothing if called on non-existing request', async function () {
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 0,
|
|
'pending approvals should be empty on init',
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
sinon.spy(permController, 'finalizePermissionsRequest')
|
|
|
|
const request = PERMS.approvedRequest(REQUEST_IDS.a, null)
|
|
|
|
await assert.doesNotReject(
|
|
permController.approvePermissionsRequest(request, null),
|
|
'should not throw on non-existing request'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
permController.finalizePermissionsRequest.notCalled,
|
|
'should not call finalizePermissionRequest'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 0,
|
|
'pending approvals should still be empty after request',
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects request with bad accounts param', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const request = PERMS.approvedRequest(
|
|
REQUEST_IDS.a,
|
|
PERMS.requests.eth_accounts()
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const requestRejection = assert.rejects(
|
|
mockRequestUserApproval(REQUEST_IDS.a),
|
|
ERRORS.validatePermittedAccounts.invalidParam(),
|
|
'should reject bad accounts'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await permController.approvePermissionsRequest(request, null)
|
|
await requestRejection
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 0,
|
|
'pending approvals should be empty after rejection',
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects request with no permissions', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const request = PERMS.approvedRequest(REQUEST_IDS.a, {})
|
|
|
|
const requestRejection = assert.rejects(
|
|
mockRequestUserApproval(REQUEST_IDS.a),
|
|
ERRORS.approvePermissionsRequest.noPermsRequested(),
|
|
'should reject if no permissions in request'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await permController.approvePermissionsRequest(request, ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
await requestRejection
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 0,
|
|
'pending approvals should be empty after rejection',
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('approves valid request', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const request = PERMS.approvedRequest(REQUEST_IDS.a, PERMS.requests.eth_accounts())
|
|
|
|
let perms
|
|
|
|
const requestApproval = assert.doesNotReject(
|
|
async () => {
|
|
perms = await mockRequestUserApproval(REQUEST_IDS.a)
|
|
},
|
|
'should not reject single valid request'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await permController.approvePermissionsRequest(request, ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
await requestApproval
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
perms, PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted),
|
|
'should produce expected approved permissions'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 0,
|
|
'pending approvals should be empty after approval',
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('approves valid requests regardless of order', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const request1 = PERMS.approvedRequest(REQUEST_IDS.a, PERMS.requests.eth_accounts())
|
|
const request2 = PERMS.approvedRequest(REQUEST_IDS.b, PERMS.requests.eth_accounts())
|
|
const request3 = PERMS.approvedRequest(REQUEST_IDS.c, PERMS.requests.eth_accounts())
|
|
|
|
let perms1, perms2
|
|
|
|
const approval1 = assert.doesNotReject(
|
|
async () => {
|
|
perms1 = await mockRequestUserApproval(REQUEST_IDS.a)
|
|
},
|
|
'should not reject request'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const approval2 = assert.doesNotReject(
|
|
async () => {
|
|
perms2 = await mockRequestUserApproval(REQUEST_IDS.b)
|
|
},
|
|
'should not reject request'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// approve out of order
|
|
await permController.approvePermissionsRequest(request2, ACCOUNTS.b.permitted)
|
|
// add a non-existing request to the mix
|
|
await permController.approvePermissionsRequest(request3, ACCOUNTS.c.permitted)
|
|
await permController.approvePermissionsRequest(request1, ACCOUNTS.a.permitted)
|
|
|
|
await approval1
|
|
await approval2
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
perms1, PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted),
|
|
'first request should produce expected approved permissions'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
perms2, PERMS.finalizedRequests.eth_accounts(ACCOUNTS.b.permitted),
|
|
'second request should produce expected approved permissions'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 0,
|
|
'pending approvals should be empty after approvals',
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('rejectPermissionsRequest', function () {
|
|
|
|
let permController, mockRequestUserApproval
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(async function () {
|
|
permController = initPermController()
|
|
mockRequestUserApproval = getMockRequestUserApprovalFunction(
|
|
permController
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('does nothing if called on non-existing request', async function () {
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 0,
|
|
'pending approvals should be empty on init',
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await assert.doesNotReject(
|
|
permController.rejectPermissionsRequest(REQUEST_IDS.a),
|
|
'should not throw on non-existing request'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 0,
|
|
'pending approvals should still be empty after request',
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects single existing request', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const requestRejection = assert.rejects(
|
|
mockRequestUserApproval(REQUEST_IDS.a),
|
|
ERRORS.rejectPermissionsRequest.rejection(),
|
|
'should reject with expected error'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
await permController.rejectPermissionsRequest(REQUEST_IDS.a)
|
|
await requestRejection
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 0,
|
|
'pending approvals should be empty after rejection',
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('rejects requests regardless of order', async function () {
|
|
|
|
const requestRejection1 = assert.rejects(
|
|
mockRequestUserApproval(REQUEST_IDS.b),
|
|
ERRORS.rejectPermissionsRequest.rejection(),
|
|
'should reject with expected error'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const requestRejection2 = assert.rejects(
|
|
mockRequestUserApproval(REQUEST_IDS.c),
|
|
ERRORS.rejectPermissionsRequest.rejection(),
|
|
'should reject with expected error'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
// reject out of order
|
|
await permController.rejectPermissionsRequest(REQUEST_IDS.c)
|
|
// add a non-existing request to the mix
|
|
await permController.rejectPermissionsRequest(REQUEST_IDS.a)
|
|
await permController.rejectPermissionsRequest(REQUEST_IDS.b)
|
|
|
|
await requestRejection1
|
|
await requestRejection2
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 0,
|
|
'pending approvals should be empty after approval',
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// see permissions-middleware-test for testing the middleware itself
|
|
describe('createMiddleware', function () {
|
|
|
|
let permController, clock
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
permController = initPermController()
|
|
clock = sinon.useFakeTimers(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
afterEach(function () {
|
|
clock.restore()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should throw on bad origin', function () {
|
|
|
|
assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController.createMiddleware({ origin: {} }),
|
|
ERRORS.createMiddleware.badOrigin(),
|
|
'should throw expected error'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController.createMiddleware({ origin: '' }),
|
|
ERRORS.createMiddleware.badOrigin(),
|
|
'should throw expected error'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController.createMiddleware({}),
|
|
ERRORS.createMiddleware.badOrigin(),
|
|
'should throw expected error'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should create a middleware', function () {
|
|
|
|
let middleware
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(
|
|
() => {
|
|
middleware = permController.createMiddleware({ origin: ORIGINS.a })
|
|
},
|
|
'should not throw'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
typeof middleware, 'function',
|
|
'should return function'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
middleware.name, 'engineAsMiddleware',
|
|
'function name should be "engineAsMiddleware"'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('should create a middleware with extensionId', function () {
|
|
|
|
const extensionId = 'fooExtension'
|
|
|
|
let middleware
|
|
assert.doesNotThrow(
|
|
() => {
|
|
middleware = permController.createMiddleware({
|
|
origin: ORIGINS.a,
|
|
extensionId,
|
|
})
|
|
},
|
|
'should not throw'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
typeof middleware, 'function',
|
|
'should return function'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
middleware.name, 'engineAsMiddleware',
|
|
'function name should be "engineAsMiddleware"'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const metadataStore = permController.store.getState()[METADATA_STORE_KEY]
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
metadataStore[ORIGINS.a], { extensionId, lastUpdated: 1 },
|
|
'metadata should be stored'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('notifyDomain', function () {
|
|
|
|
let notifications, permController
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
notifications = initNotifications()
|
|
permController = initPermController(notifications)
|
|
sinon.spy(permController.permissionsLog, 'updateAccountsHistory')
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('notifyDomain handles accountsChanged', async function () {
|
|
|
|
permController.notifyDomain(
|
|
ORIGINS.a,
|
|
NOTIFICATIONS.newAccounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted),
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
permController.permissionsLog.updateAccountsHistory.calledOnce,
|
|
'permissionsLog.updateAccountsHistory should have been called once'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.a],
|
|
[ NOTIFICATIONS.newAccounts(ACCOUNTS.a.permitted) ],
|
|
'origin should have correct notification'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('notifyDomain handles notifications other than accountsChanged', async function () {
|
|
|
|
permController.notifyDomain(ORIGINS.a, NOTIFICATIONS.test())
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
permController.permissionsLog.updateAccountsHistory.notCalled,
|
|
'permissionsLog.updateAccountsHistory should not have been called'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
notifications[ORIGINS.a],
|
|
[ NOTIFICATIONS.test() ],
|
|
'origin should have correct notification'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('addDomainMetadata', function () {
|
|
|
|
let permController, clock
|
|
|
|
function getMockMetadata (size) {
|
|
const dummyData = {}
|
|
for (let i = 0; i < size; i++) {
|
|
const key = i.toString()
|
|
dummyData[key] = {}
|
|
}
|
|
return dummyData
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
permController = initPermController()
|
|
permController._setDomainMetadata = sinon.fake()
|
|
clock = sinon.useFakeTimers(1)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
afterEach(function () {
|
|
clock.restore()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('calls setter function with expected new state when adding domain', function () {
|
|
|
|
permController.store.getState = sinon.fake.returns({
|
|
[METADATA_STORE_KEY]: {
|
|
[ORIGINS.a]: {
|
|
foo: 'bar',
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
permController.addDomainMetadata(ORIGINS.b, { foo: 'bar' })
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
permController.store.getState.called,
|
|
'should have called store.getState'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController._setDomainMetadata.getCalls().length, 1,
|
|
'should have called _setDomainMetadata once'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
permController._setDomainMetadata.lastCall.args,
|
|
[{
|
|
[ORIGINS.a]: {
|
|
foo: 'bar',
|
|
},
|
|
[ORIGINS.b]: {
|
|
foo: 'bar',
|
|
lastUpdated: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
}]
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('calls setter function with expected new states when updating existing domain', function () {
|
|
|
|
permController.store.getState = sinon.fake.returns({
|
|
[METADATA_STORE_KEY]: {
|
|
[ORIGINS.a]: {
|
|
foo: 'bar',
|
|
},
|
|
[ORIGINS.b]: {
|
|
bar: 'baz',
|
|
},
|
|
},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
permController.addDomainMetadata(ORIGINS.b, { foo: 'bar' })
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
permController.store.getState.called,
|
|
'should have called store.getState'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController._setDomainMetadata.getCalls().length, 1,
|
|
'should have called _setDomainMetadata once'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
permController._setDomainMetadata.lastCall.args,
|
|
[{
|
|
[ORIGINS.a]: {
|
|
foo: 'bar',
|
|
},
|
|
[ORIGINS.b]: {
|
|
foo: 'bar',
|
|
bar: 'baz',
|
|
lastUpdated: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
}]
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('pops metadata on add when too many origins are pending', function () {
|
|
|
|
sinon.spy(permController._pendingSiteMetadata, 'delete')
|
|
|
|
const mockMetadata = getMockMetadata(METADATA_CACHE_MAX_SIZE)
|
|
const expectedDeletedOrigin = Object.keys(mockMetadata)[0]
|
|
|
|
permController.store.getState = sinon.fake.returns({
|
|
[METADATA_STORE_KEY]: { ...mockMetadata },
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
// populate permController._pendingSiteMetadata, as though these origins
|
|
// were actually added
|
|
Object.keys(mockMetadata).forEach((origin) => {
|
|
permController._pendingSiteMetadata.add(origin)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
permController.addDomainMetadata(ORIGINS.a, { foo: 'bar' })
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
permController.store.getState.called,
|
|
'should have called store.getState'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
const expectedMetadata = {
|
|
...mockMetadata,
|
|
[ORIGINS.a]: {
|
|
foo: 'bar',
|
|
lastUpdated: 1,
|
|
},
|
|
}
|
|
delete expectedMetadata[expectedDeletedOrigin]
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
permController._pendingSiteMetadata.delete.calledOnceWithExactly(expectedDeletedOrigin),
|
|
'should have called _pendingSiteMetadata.delete once'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController._setDomainMetadata.getCalls().length, 1,
|
|
'should have called _setDomainMetadata once'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
permController._setDomainMetadata.lastCall.args,
|
|
[expectedMetadata],
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('_trimDomainMetadata', function () {
|
|
|
|
const permController = initPermController()
|
|
|
|
it('trims domain metadata for domains without permissions', function () {
|
|
|
|
const metadataArg = {
|
|
[ORIGINS.a]: {},
|
|
[ORIGINS.b]: {},
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
permController.permissions.getDomains = sinon.fake.returns({
|
|
[ORIGINS.a]: {},
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
const metadataResult = permController._trimDomainMetadata(metadataArg)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.permissions.getDomains.getCalls().length, 1,
|
|
'should have called permissions.getDomains once'
|
|
)
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
metadataResult,
|
|
{
|
|
[ORIGINS.a]: {},
|
|
},
|
|
'should have produced expected state'
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
describe('miscellanea and edge cases', function () {
|
|
|
|
let permController
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(function () {
|
|
permController = initPermController()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('requestAccountsPermission calls _requestAccountsPermission with an explicit request ID', async function () {
|
|
const _requestPermissions = sinon.stub(permController, '_requestPermissions').resolves()
|
|
await permController.requestAccountsPermission('example.com')
|
|
assert.ok(_requestPermissions.calledOnceWithExactly(
|
|
sinon.match.object.and(sinon.match.has('origin')).and(sinon.match.has('id')),
|
|
{ eth_accounts: {} },
|
|
))
|
|
_requestPermissions.restore()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('_addPendingApproval: should throw if adding origin twice', function () {
|
|
|
|
const id = nanoid()
|
|
const origin = ORIGINS.a
|
|
|
|
permController._addPendingApproval(id, origin, noop, noop)
|
|
|
|
const otherId = nanoid()
|
|
|
|
assert.throws(
|
|
() => permController._addPendingApproval(otherId, origin, noop, noop),
|
|
ERRORS.pendingApprovals.duplicateOriginOrId(otherId, origin),
|
|
'should throw expected error'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.size, 1,
|
|
'pending approvals should have single entry',
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.equal(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovalOrigins.size, 1,
|
|
'pending approval origins should have single item',
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.deepEqual(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovals.get(id),
|
|
{ origin, resolve: noop, reject: noop },
|
|
'pending approvals should have expected entry'
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
assert.ok(
|
|
permController.pendingApprovalOrigins.has(origin),
|
|
'pending approval origins should have expected item',
|
|
)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('addInternalMethodPrefix', function () {
|
|
const str = 'foo'
|
|
const res = addInternalMethodPrefix(str)
|
|
assert.equal(res, WALLET_PREFIX + str, 'should prefix correctly')
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
})
|
|
|