kanbanworkflowstimelinescrumrubyroadmapproject-planningproject-managementopenprojectangularissue-trackerifcgantt-chartganttbug-trackerboardsbcf
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
172 lines
7.8 KiB
172 lines
7.8 KiB
#-- encoding: UTF-8
|
|
|
|
#-- copyright
|
|
# OpenProject is an open source project management software.
|
|
# Copyright (C) 2012-2020 the OpenProject GmbH
|
|
#
|
|
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3.
|
|
#
|
|
# OpenProject is a fork of ChiliProject, which is a fork of Redmine. The copyright follows:
|
|
# Copyright (C) 2006-2017 Jean-Philippe Lang
|
|
# Copyright (C) 2010-2013 the ChiliProject Team
|
|
#
|
|
# This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
|
|
# modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
|
|
# as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
|
|
# of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
|
|
#
|
|
# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
|
|
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
|
|
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
|
|
# GNU General Public License for more details.
|
|
#
|
|
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
|
|
# along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
|
|
# Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA.
|
|
#
|
|
# See docs/COPYRIGHT.rdoc for more details.
|
|
#++
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
module WorkPackages::Scopes
|
|
class ForScheduling
|
|
class << self
|
|
# Fetches all work packages that need to be evaluated for eventual rescheduling after a related (i.e. follows/precedes
|
|
# and hierarchy) work package is modified or created.
|
|
#
|
|
# The SQL relies on a recursive CTE which will fetch all work packages that are connected to the rescheduled work package
|
|
# via relations (follows/precedes and/or hierarchy) either directly or transitively. It will do so by increasing the relation path
|
|
# length one at a time and will stop on that path if the work package evaluated to be added is either:
|
|
# * itself scheduled manually
|
|
# * having all of it's children scheduled manually
|
|
#
|
|
# The children themselves are scheduled manually if all of their children are scheduled manually which repeats itself down to the leaf
|
|
# work packages. So another way of putting it, and that is how the sql statement works, is that a work package is considered to
|
|
# be scheduled manually if *all* of the paths to their leafs have at least one work package that is scheduled manually.
|
|
# For example in case of the hierarchy:
|
|
# A and B <- hierarchy (C is parent of both A and B) - C <- hierarchy - D
|
|
# if A and B are both scheduled manually, C is also scheduled manually and so is D. But if only A is scheduled manually,
|
|
# B, C and D are scheduled automatically.
|
|
#
|
|
# The recursiveness will of course also stop if no more work packages can be added.
|
|
#
|
|
# The work packages can either be connected via a follows relationship, a hierarchy relationship
|
|
# or a combination of both.
|
|
# E.g. in a graph of
|
|
# A <- follows - B <- hierarchy (C is parent of B) - C <- follows D
|
|
#
|
|
# D would also be subject to reschedule.
|
|
#
|
|
# At least for hierarchical relationships, we need to follow the relationship in both directions.
|
|
# E.g. in a graph of
|
|
# A <- follows - B - hierarchy (B is parent of C) -> C <- follows D
|
|
#
|
|
# D would also be subject to reschedule.
|
|
#
|
|
# That possible switch in direction means that we cannot simply get all possibly affected work packages by one
|
|
# SQL query which the DAG implementation would have allowed us to do otherwise.
|
|
#
|
|
# Currently, we do not rely on DAG for increasing the path length at all. We are still employing it in the check
|
|
# for whether all paths to the leaf have a manually scheduled work package.
|
|
#
|
|
# A further improvement in performance might be reachable by also employing DAG mechanisms to increase the path length.
|
|
#
|
|
# @param work_packages WorkPackage[] A set of work packages for which the set of related work packages that might
|
|
# be subject to reschedule is fetched.
|
|
def fetch(work_packages)
|
|
return WorkPackage.none if work_packages.empty?
|
|
|
|
sql = <<~SQL
|
|
WITH
|
|
RECURSIVE
|
|
#{paths_sql(work_packages)}
|
|
|
|
SELECT id
|
|
FROM to_schedule
|
|
WHERE
|
|
NOT to_schedule.manually
|
|
SQL
|
|
|
|
WorkPackage
|
|
.where("id IN (#{sql})")
|
|
.where.not(id: work_packages)
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
private
|
|
|
|
# This recursive CTE fetches all work packages that are in a direct or transitive follows and/or hierarchy
|
|
# relationship with the provided work package.
|
|
#
|
|
# Hierarchy relationships are followed up as well as down (from and to) but follows relations are only followed
|
|
# from the predecessor to the successor (from_id to to_id).
|
|
#
|
|
# The CTE starts from the provided work package and for that returns:
|
|
# * the id of the work package
|
|
# * the information, that the starting work package is not manually scheduled.
|
|
# Whether the starting work package is manually scheduled or in fact automatically scheduled does make no
|
|
# difference but we need those four columns later on.
|
|
#
|
|
# For each recursive step, we return all work packages that are directly related to our current set of work
|
|
# packages by a hierarchy (up or down) or follows relationship (only successors). For each such work package
|
|
# the statement returns:
|
|
# * id of the work package that is currently at the end of a path.
|
|
# * the flag indicating whether the added work package is automatically or manually scheduled. This also includes
|
|
# whether *all* of the added work package's descendants are automatically or manually scheduled.
|
|
#
|
|
# Paths whose ending work package is marked to be manually scheduled are not joined with any more.
|
|
def paths_sql(work_packages)
|
|
values = work_packages.map { |wp| "(#{wp.id}, false)" }.join(', ')
|
|
|
|
<<~SQL
|
|
to_schedule (id, manually) AS (
|
|
SELECT * FROM (VALUES#{values}) AS t(id, manually)
|
|
|
|
UNION
|
|
|
|
SELECT
|
|
CASE
|
|
WHEN relations.to_id = to_schedule.id
|
|
THEN relations.from_id
|
|
ELSE relations.to_id
|
|
END id,
|
|
(work_packages.schedule_manually OR COALESCE(descendants.schedule_manually, false)) manually
|
|
FROM
|
|
to_schedule
|
|
JOIN
|
|
relations
|
|
ON NOT to_schedule.manually
|
|
AND (#{relations_condition_sql})
|
|
AND
|
|
((relations.to_id = to_schedule.id)
|
|
OR (relations.from_id = to_schedule.id AND relations.follows = 0))
|
|
LEFT JOIN work_packages
|
|
ON (CASE
|
|
WHEN relations.to_id = to_schedule.id
|
|
THEN relations.from_id
|
|
ELSE relations.to_id
|
|
END) = work_packages.id
|
|
LEFT JOIN (
|
|
SELECT
|
|
relations.from_id,
|
|
bool_and(COALESCE(work_packages.schedule_manually, false)) schedule_manually
|
|
FROM relations relations
|
|
JOIN work_packages
|
|
ON
|
|
work_packages.id = relations.to_id
|
|
AND relations.follows = 0 AND #{relations_condition_sql(transitive: true)}
|
|
GROUP BY relations.from_id
|
|
) descendants ON work_packages.id = descendants.from_id
|
|
)
|
|
SQL
|
|
end
|
|
|
|
def relations_condition_sql(transitive: false)
|
|
<<~SQL
|
|
"relations"."relates" = 0 AND "relations"."duplicates" = 0 AND "relations"."blocks" = 0 AND "relations"."includes" = 0 AND "relations"."requires" = 0
|
|
AND (relations.hierarchy + relations.relates + relations.duplicates + relations.follows + relations.blocks + relations.includes + relations.requires #{transitive ? '>' : ''}= 1)
|
|
SQL
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
end
|
|
|