slither/tests/check-erc/test_1.txt

# Check ERC20

## Check functions
[✓] totalSupply() is present
	[✓] totalSupply() -> (uint256) (correct return type)
	[✓] totalSupply() is view
[ ] balanceOf(address) is missing 
[ ] transfer(address,uint256) is missing 
[ ] transferFrom(address,address,uint256) is missing 
[ ] approve(address,uint256) is missing 
[ ] allowance(address,address) is missing 
[ ] name() is missing (optional)
[ ] symbol() is missing (optional)
[ ] decimals() is missing (optional)

## Check events
[ ] Transfer(address,address,uint256) is missing
[ ] Approval(address,address,uint256) is missing


	[ ] ERC20 is not protected for the ERC20 approval race condition
slither erc check: - Rename tool to slither-check-erc - Use json_utils for output - Simple test case 5 years ago			`# Check ERC20`

			`## Check functions`
			`[✓] totalSupply() is present`
Fix slither-check-erc output This commit makes the `slither-check-erc` more relevant: - when we confirm function interface's return type, we will now show it properly - we had a mistake that we logged that the "value" is incorrect while we meant "type" 3 years ago			`[✓] totalSupply() -> (uint256) (correct return type)`
slither erc check: - Rename tool to slither-check-erc - Use json_utils for output - Simple test case 5 years ago			`[✓] totalSupply() is view`
			`[ ] balanceOf(address) is missing`
			`[ ] transfer(address,uint256) is missing`
			`[ ] transferFrom(address,address,uint256) is missing`
			`[ ] approve(address,uint256) is missing`
			`[ ] allowance(address,address) is missing`
			`[ ] name() is missing (optional)`
			`[ ] symbol() is missing (optional)`
			`[ ] decimals() is missing (optional)`

			`## Check events`
			`[ ] Transfer(address,address,uint256) is missing`
			`[ ] Approval(address,address,uint256) is missing`


			`[ ] ERC20 is not protected for the ERC20 approval race condition`