You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
205 lines
6.9 KiB
205 lines
6.9 KiB
/* eslint-env node, mocha */
|
|
|
|
const path = require('path');
|
|
const getInstrumentedVersion = require('./../lib/instrumentSolidity.js');
|
|
const util = require('./util/util.js');
|
|
const CoverageMap = require('./../lib/coverageMap');
|
|
const vm = require('./util/vm');
|
|
const assert = require('assert');
|
|
|
|
describe('conditional statements', () => {
|
|
const filePath = path.resolve('./test.sol');
|
|
const pathPrefix = './';
|
|
|
|
before(() => process.env.NO_EVENTS_FILTER = true);
|
|
|
|
it('should cover a conditional that reaches the consequent (same-line)', done => {
|
|
const contract = util.getCode('conditional/sameline-consequent.sol');
|
|
const info = getInstrumentedVersion(contract, filePath);
|
|
const coverage = new CoverageMap();
|
|
coverage.addContract(info, filePath);
|
|
|
|
vm.execute(info.contract, 'a', []).then(events => {
|
|
const mapping = coverage.generate(events, pathPrefix);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].l, {
|
|
5: 1, 6: 1, 7: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].b, {
|
|
1: [1, 0],
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].s, {
|
|
1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].f, {
|
|
1: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
done();
|
|
}).catch(done);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should cover a conditional that reaches the alternate (same-line)', done => {
|
|
const contract = util.getCode('conditional/sameline-alternate.sol');
|
|
const info = getInstrumentedVersion(contract, filePath);
|
|
const coverage = new CoverageMap();
|
|
coverage.addContract(info, filePath);
|
|
|
|
vm.execute(info.contract, 'a', []).then(events => {
|
|
const mapping = coverage.generate(events, pathPrefix);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].l, {
|
|
5: 1, 6: 1, 7: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].b, {
|
|
1: [0, 1],
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].s, {
|
|
1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].f, {
|
|
1: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
done();
|
|
}).catch(done);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should cover a conditional that reaches the consequent (multi-line)', done => {
|
|
const contract = util.getCode('conditional/multiline-consequent.sol');
|
|
const info = getInstrumentedVersion(contract, filePath);
|
|
const coverage = new CoverageMap();
|
|
coverage.addContract(info, filePath);
|
|
|
|
vm.execute(info.contract, 'a', []).then(events => {
|
|
const mapping = coverage.generate(events, pathPrefix);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].l, {
|
|
5: 1, 6: 1, 7: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].b, {
|
|
1: [1, 0],
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].s, {
|
|
1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].f, {
|
|
1: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
done();
|
|
}).catch(done);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should cover a conditional that reaches the alternate (multi-line)', done => {
|
|
const contract = util.getCode('conditional/multiline-alternate.sol');
|
|
const info = getInstrumentedVersion(contract, filePath);
|
|
const coverage = new CoverageMap();
|
|
coverage.addContract(info, filePath);
|
|
|
|
vm.execute(info.contract, 'a', []).then(events => {
|
|
const mapping = coverage.generate(events, pathPrefix);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].l, {
|
|
5: 1, 6: 1, 7: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].b, {
|
|
1: [0, 1],
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].s, {
|
|
1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].f, {
|
|
1: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
done();
|
|
}).catch(done);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should cover a DeclarativeExpression assignment by conditional that reaches the alternate', done => {
|
|
const contract = util.getCode('conditional/declarative-exp-assignment-alternate.sol');
|
|
const info = getInstrumentedVersion(contract, filePath);
|
|
const coverage = new CoverageMap();
|
|
coverage.addContract(info, filePath);
|
|
|
|
// Runs bool z = (x) ? false : true;
|
|
vm.execute(info.contract, 'a', []).then(events => {
|
|
const mapping = coverage.generate(events, pathPrefix);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].l, {
|
|
5: 1, 6: 1, 7: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].b, {
|
|
1: [0, 1],
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].s, {
|
|
1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].f, {
|
|
1: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
done();
|
|
}).catch(done);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should cover an Identifier assignment by conditional that reaches the alternate', done => {
|
|
const contract = util.getCode('conditional/identifier-assignment-alternate.sol');
|
|
const info = getInstrumentedVersion(contract, filePath);
|
|
const coverage = new CoverageMap();
|
|
coverage.addContract(info, filePath);
|
|
|
|
// Runs z = (x) ? false : true;
|
|
vm.execute(info.contract, 'a', []).then(events => {
|
|
const mapping = coverage.generate(events, pathPrefix);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].l, {
|
|
5: 1, 6: 1, 7: 1, 8: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].b, {
|
|
1: [0, 1],
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].s, {
|
|
1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1, 4: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].f, {
|
|
1: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
done();
|
|
}).catch(done);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
it('should cover an assignment to a member expression (reaches the alternate)', done => {
|
|
const contract = util.getCode('conditional/mapping-assignment.sol');
|
|
const info = getInstrumentedVersion(contract, filePath);
|
|
const coverage = new CoverageMap();
|
|
coverage.addContract(info, filePath);
|
|
|
|
vm.execute(info.contract, 'a', []).then(events => {
|
|
const mapping = coverage.generate(events, pathPrefix);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].l, {
|
|
'11': 1, '12': 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].b, {
|
|
1: [0, 1],
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].s, {
|
|
'1': 1, '2': 1,
|
|
});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].f, {
|
|
1: 1,
|
|
});
|
|
done();
|
|
}).catch(done);
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Solcover has trouble with this case. The conditional coverage strategy relies on being able to
|
|
// reference the left-hand variable before its value is assigned. Solidity doesn't allow this
|
|
// for 'var'.
|
|
|
|
/* it('should cover a var decl assignment by conditional that reaches the alternate', (done) => {
|
|
const contract = util.getCode('conditional/variable-decl-assignment-alternate.sol');
|
|
const info = getInstrumentedVersion(contract, filePath);
|
|
const coverage = new CoverageMap();
|
|
coverage.addContract(info, filePath);
|
|
// Runs var z = (x) ? y = false : y = false;
|
|
vm.execute(info.contract, 'a', []).then(events => {
|
|
const mapping = coverage.generate(events, pathPrefix);
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].l, {5: 1, 6: 1, 7: 1});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].b, {'1': [0, 1]});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].s, {1: 1, 2: 1, 3: 1});
|
|
assert.deepEqual(mapping[filePath].f, {1: 1});
|
|
done();
|
|
}).catch(done);
|
|
});*/
|
|
});
|
|
|