Add more log for aws debugging

blockchain/utxopool.go

@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ import (
 	"github.com/dedis/kyber/sign/schnorr"
 	"github.com/simple-rules/harmony-benchmark/crypto"
 	"github.com/simple-rules/harmony-benchmark/log"
+	"math/rand"
 	"sync"
 )
 
@@ -408,6 +409,9 @@ func (utxoPool *UTXOPool) SelectTransactionsForNewBlock(transactions []*Transact
 		err, crossShard := utxoPool.VerifyOneTransaction(tx, &spentTXOs)
 
 		if len(selected) < maxNumTxs {
+			if err != nil && rand.Intn(10) < 1 {
+				log.Warn("Invalid Transaction", "Reason", err)
+			}
 			if err == nil || crossShard {
 				if crossShard {
 					proof := CrossShardTxProof{Accept: err == nil, TxID: tx.ID, TxInput: getShardTxInput(tx, utxoPool.ShardID)}

client/client.go

@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ func (client *Client) handleProofOfLockMessage(proofs *[]blockchain.CrossShardTx
 	//fmt.Printf("PENDING CLIENT TX - %d\n", len(client.PendingCrossTxs))
 	// Loop through the newly received list of proofs
 	client.PendingCrossTxsMutex.Lock()
-	log.Info("CLIENT PENDING TX", "num", len(client.PendingCrossTxs))
+	log.Info("CLIENT PENDING CROSS TX", "num", len(client.PendingCrossTxs))
 	for _, proof := range *proofs {
 		// Find the corresponding pending cross tx
 		txAndProofs, ok := client.PendingCrossTxs[proof.TxID]

consensus/consensus_leader.go

@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ func (consensus *Consensus) processCommitMessage(payload []byte, targetState Con
 		point := crypto.Ed25519Curve.Point()
 		point.UnmarshalBinary(commitment)
 		(*commitments)[validatorId] = point
+		consensus.Log.Debug("Received new commit message", "num", len(*commitments))
 		// Set the bitmap indicate this validate signed. TODO: figure out how to resolve the inconsistency of validators from commit and response messages
 		bitmap.SetKey(value.PubKey, true)
 	}
@@ -177,7 +178,7 @@ func (consensus *Consensus) processCommitMessage(payload []byte, targetState Con
 	}
 
 	if len((*commitments)) >= len(consensus.publicKeys) && consensus.state < targetState {
-		consensus.Log.Debug("Enough commitments received with signatures", "num", len((*commitments)), "state", consensus.state)
+		consensus.Log.Debug("Enough commitments received with signatures", "num", len(*commitments), "state", consensus.state)
 
 		// Broadcast challenge
 		msgTypeToSend := proto_consensus.CHALLENGE // targetState == CHALLENGE_DONE
@@ -297,6 +298,7 @@ func (consensus *Consensus) processResponseMessage(payload []byte, targetState C
 			shouldProcess = false
 		} else {
 			(*responses)[validatorId] = responseScalar
+			consensus.Log.Debug("Received new response message", "num", len(*responses))
 			// Set the bitmap indicate this validate signed. TODO: figure out how to resolve the inconsistency of validators from commit and response messages
 			consensus.bitmap.SetKey(value.PubKey, true)
 		}

consensus/consensus_validator.go

@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ func (consensus *Consensus) ProcessMessageValidator(message []byte) {
 		consensus.Log.Error("Failed to get consensus message payload", "err", err, "consensus", consensus)
 	}
 
+	consensus.Log.Info("Received consensus Message", "type", msgType)
 	switch msgType {
 	case proto_consensus.ANNOUNCE:
 		consensus.processAnnounceMessage(payload)
@@ -68,8 +69,6 @@ func (consensus *Consensus) processAnnounceMessage(payload []byte) {
 	offset += 64
 	//#### END: Read payload data
 
-	consensus.Log.Info("Received Announce Message", "LeaderId", leaderId)
-
 	copy(consensus.blockHash[:], blockHash[:])
 
 	// Verify block data