"description":"A possible transaction order independence vulnerability exists in function _function_0xd24b08cc. The value or direction of the call statement is determined from a tainted storage location",
"function":"_function_0xd24b08cc",
"type":"Warning",
"address":779,
"debug":"<DEBUG-DATA>"
},
{
"title":"Unchecked CALL return value",
"description":"The return value of an external call is not checked. Note that execution continue even if the called contract throws.",
@ -55,6 +55,17 @@ The contract account state is changed after an external call. Consider that the
This contract executes a message call to an address provided as a function argument. Generally, it is not recommended to call user-supplied adresses using Solidity's call() construct. Note that attackers might leverage reentrancy attacks to exploit race conditions or manipulate this contract's state.
## Transaction order dependence
- Type: Warning
- Contract: Unknown
- Function name: `_function_0xd24b08cc`
- PC address: 779
### Description
A possible transaction order independence vulnerability exists in function _function_0xd24b08cc. The value or direction of the call statement is determined from a tainted storage location
This contract executes a message call to an address provided as a function argument. Generally, it is not recommended to call user-supplied adresses using Solidity's call() construct. Note that attackers might leverage reentrancy attacks to exploit race conditions or manipulate this contract's state.
--------------------
==== Transaction order dependence ====
Type: Warning
Contract: Unknown
Function name: _function_0xd24b08cc
PC address: 779
A possible transaction order independence vulnerability exists in function _function_0xd24b08cc. The value or direction of the call statement is determined from a tainted storage location
"description":"A possible transaction order independence vulnerability exists in function _function_0xe9874106. The value or direction of the call statement is determined from a tainted storage location",
@ -48,4 +48,15 @@ A reachable exception (opcode 0xfe) has been detected. This can be caused by typ
### Description
A reachable exception (opcode 0xfe) has been detected. This can be caused by type errors, division by zero, out-of-bounds array access, or assert violations. This is acceptable in most situations. Note however that `assert()` should only be used to check invariants. Use `require()` for regular input checking.
A reachable exception (opcode 0xfe) has been detected. This can be caused by type errors, division by zero, out-of-bounds array access, or assert violations. This is acceptable in most situations. Note however that `assert()` should only be used to check invariants. Use `require()` for regular input checking.
## Transaction order dependence
- Type: Warning
- Contract: Unknown
- Function name: `_function_0xe9874106`
- PC address: 1285
### Description
A possible transaction order independence vulnerability exists in function _function_0xe9874106. The value or direction of the call statement is determined from a tainted storage location
A reachable exception (opcode 0xfe) has been detected. This can be caused by type errors, division by zero, out-of-bounds array access, or assert violations. This is acceptable in most situations. Note however that `assert()` should only be used to check invariants. Use `require()` for regular input checking.
--------------------
==== Transaction order dependence ====
Type: Warning
Contract: Unknown
Function name: _function_0xe9874106
PC address: 1285
A possible transaction order independence vulnerability exists in function _function_0xe9874106. The value or direction of the call statement is determined from a tainted storage location